Sex differences in brain activation elicited by humor
Abstract
With recent investigation beginning to reveal the cortical and subcortical neuroanatomical correlates of humor appreciation, the present event-related functional MRI (fMRI) study was designed to elucidate sex-specific recruitment of these humor related networks. Twenty healthy subjects (10 females) underwent fMRI scanning while subjectively rating 70 verbal and nonverbal achromatic cartoons as funny or unfunny. Data were analyzed by comparing blood oxygenation-level-dependent signal activation during funny and unfunny stimuli. Males and females share an extensive humor-response strategy as indicated by recruitment of similar brain regions: both activate the temporal-occipital junction and temporal pole, structures implicated in semantic knowledge and juxtaposition, and the inferior frontal gyrus, likely to be involved in language processing. Females, however, activate the left prefrontal cortex more than males, suggesting a greater degree of executive processing and language-based decoding. Females also exhibit greater activation of mesolimbic regions, including the nucleus accumbens, implying greater reward network response and possibly less reward expectation. These results indicate sex-specific differences in neural response to humor with implications for sex-based disparities in the integration of cognition and emotion.
Additional Information
© 2005 by The National Academy of Sciences. Edited by Marcus E. Raichle, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, and approved September 13, 2005 (received for review November 13, 2004). Conflict of interest statement: No conflicts declared. We thank Gaurav Srivastava, Michael D. Greicius, and Amy Garrett for their assistance. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants MH01142 (to A.L.R.) and HD40761 (to V.M.) and a Howard Hughes Summer Fellowship from the Department of Biological Sciences at Stanford University (to E.A.). Author contributions: E.A., D.M., V.M., and A.L.R. designed research; E.A. and D.M. performed research; V.M. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; E.A., D.M., B.J., and A.L.R. analyzed data; and E.A., D.M., and A.L.R. wrote the paper. This paper was submitted directly (Track II) to the PNAS office.Attached Files
Published - 16496.full.pdf
Files
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:be8cf086bd48736ac1eb1ec60925fee5
|
543.5 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
- PMCID
- PMC1277963
- Eprint ID
- 85109
- Resolver ID
- CaltechAUTHORS:20180305-152702121
- NIH
- MH01142
- NIH
- HD40761
- Stanford University
- Created
-
2018-03-05Created from EPrint's datestamp field
- Updated
-
2021-11-15Created from EPrint's last_modified field