Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published March 2018 | Published + Supplemental Material
Journal Article Open

Near Equilibrium ^(13)C-^(18)O Bonding During Inorganic Calcite Precipitation under Chemo-Stat Conditions

Abstract

We report results of ^(13)C/^(12)C, ^(18)O/^(16)O, and ^(13)C-^(18)O "clumped" isotope analyses from a series of calcite precipitation experiments from aqueous solutions under laboratory conditions. Chemo‐stat precipitation experiments were performed to synthetically form calcite from aqueous solution onto ^(43)Ca‐labeled calcite seed crystals. Formation rate was controlled during the experiments to investigate the effect of precipitation rate and temperature on ^(13)C-^(18)O bonding in calcite, where rates ranged from 10^(−6.88) to 10^(−8.20)mol m^(−2) s^(−1) at three temperatures (10, 20, and 30°C). No relation was observed between precipitation rate and ^(13)C-^(18)O bonding proportion over the range of precipitation rates used. The relation between Δ_(47) and temperature produced was comparable to calibration studies which report a relatively high sensitivity of ^(13)C-^(18)O bonding to temperature over the range investigated. Comparing solution conditions across multiple experimental data sets indicates an inverse relation between saturation state and ^(13)C-^(18)O bonding, where high super‐saturation conditions are likely to be furthest from equilibrium ^(13)C-^(18)O partitioning. Carbon fractionation between calcite and HCO-_(3(aq)) was found to be a temperature independent value of +1.6‰. The temperature‐dependent calcite‐water ^(18)O/^(16)O fractionation relation determined in this study is slightly different (larger α_(calcite-H_2O) value) than those measured in several previous investigations. Significantly, we observe a dependence of the 18O/16O isotope fractionation factor on growth rate. Taken together, these findings suggest carbonate growth in our experiments approached equilibrium more closely than previous experiments of this type, yet did not achieve full O isotope equilibrium.

Additional Information

© 2018. American Geophysical Union. Received 28 JUN 2017; Accepted 13 FEB 2018; Accepted article online 26 FEB 2018; Published online 23 MAR 2018; Corrected 9 APR 2018. Nami Kitchen is recognized for instrument and analytical assistance. The Stable Isotope Facility at UC‐Davis is appreciated for supporting analyses. We thank James M. Watkins, Hagit P. Affek, and three anonymous reviewers for helpful comments and suggestions that greatly improved this document. We also thank Aradhna E. Tripati for her editorial handling. This work was supported by the NASA Headquarters under the NASA Earth and Space Science Fellowship Program—grant NNX13AP40H as well as NASA Astrobiology Institute grant NNA13AA94A. The authors declare no conflicts of interest from their affiliation or funding.

Errata

In the originally published version of this article, in the numerator of Equation 5, the multiplication symbol was incorrectly set as an addition symbol. The equation has since been corrected, and this version may be considered the authoritative version of record.

Attached Files

Published - Levitt_et_al-2018-Geochemistry,_Geophysics,_Geosystems.pdf

Supplemental Material - ggge21521-sup-0001-TxtS01.docx

Supplemental Material - ggge21521-sup-0002-TxtS02.pdf

Files

ggge21521-sup-0002-TxtS02.pdf
Files (57.5 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:54fa38bac453e5a77b4b399c5ba8f9d9
83.7 kB Download
md5:442adf1cba11fb3dfaeacbbd21269386
55.7 MB Preview Download
md5:832a51759126d93fff55ae33326d8e6e
1.7 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 22, 2023
Modified:
October 18, 2023