Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published April 6, 2018 | Published + Supplemental Material
Journal Article Open

The protein kinase PERK/EIF2AK3 regulates proinsulin processing not via protein synthesis but by controlling endoplasmic reticulum chaperones

Abstract

Loss-of-function mutations of the protein kinase PERK (EIF2AK3) in humans and mice cause permanent neonatal diabetes and severe proinsulin aggregation in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), highlighting the essential role of PERK in insulin production in pancreatic β cells. As PERK is generally known as a translational regulator of the unfolded protein response (UPR), the underlying cause of these β cell defects has often been attributed to derepression of proinsulin synthesis, resulting in proinsulin overload in the ER. Using high-resolution imaging and standard protein fractionation and immunological methods we have examined the PERK-dependent phenotype more closely. We found that whereas proinsulin aggregation requires new protein synthesis, global protein and proinsulin synthesis are down-regulated in PERK-inhibited cells, strongly arguing against proinsulin overproduction being the root cause of their aberrant ER phenotype. Furthermore, we show that PERK regulates proinsulin proteostasis by modulating ER chaperones, including BiP and ERp72. Transgenic overexpression of BiP and BiP knockdown (KD) both promoted proinsulin aggregation, whereas ERp72 overexpression and knockdown rescued it. These findings underscore the importance of ER chaperones working in concert to achieve control of insulin production and identify a role for PERK in maintaining a functional balance among these chaperones.

Additional Information

© 2018 American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. Received August 21, 2017. Accepted February 14, 2018. First Published on February 14, 2018. We thank Dr. Jeff Axten and Dr. Rakesh Kumar for providing the GSK2606414 PERK inhibitor and discussions about the effects of PERK inhibition. We thank Dr. Christopher Newgard, Dr. Scott Kimball, Dr. Jun-Ichi Miyazaki, Dr. Allen Volchuk, and Dr. Anne Bertolotti for providing experimental materials. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant R01 DK88140 and a Huck Graduate Research Dissertation Award (to C. R. S.) from the Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences at Penn State University. The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Author contributions: Conceptualization, C. R. S., R. W., J. H., B. C. M., D. R.C.; methodology, C. R. S., R. W., J. H., R. A. B., B. C. M., D. R. C.; validation, C. R. S., R. W., J. H., R. A. B., B. C. M., D. R. C.; formal analysis, C. R. S., R. W., J. H., R. A. B.; investigation, C. R. S., R. W., J. H., S. C. B., R. A. B., B. C. M.; resources, J. C. P., A. W. P., S. C-F., M. N.; writing/original draft, C. R. S., R. W.; writing/review and editing, C. R. S., B. C. M., R. A. B., D. R. C.; visualization? C. R. S.; funding acquisition, C. R. S., B. C. M., and D. R. C.

Attached Files

Published - J._Biol._Chem.-2018-Sowers-5134-49.pdf

Supplemental Material - jbc.M117.813790-1.pdf

Files

J._Biol._Chem.-2018-Sowers-5134-49.pdf
Files (4.0 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:1d84a4c4c167bda89e2abd1e8df9256a
2.6 MB Preview Download
md5:b411c3e556d61d492706f4c887b03ce1
1.4 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 21, 2023
Modified:
October 18, 2023