Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published May 1986 | public
Journal Article

Covering, dominance, and institution-free properties of social change

Abstract

This paper shows that different institutional structures for aggregation of preferences under majority rule may generate social choices that are quite similar, so that the actual social choice may be rather insensitive to the choice of institutional rules. Specifically, in a multidimensional setting, where all voters have strictly quasi-concave preferences, it is shown that the "uncovered set" contains the outcomes that would arise from equilibrium behavior under three different institutional settings. The three institutional settings are two-candidate competition in a large electorate, cooperative behavior in small committees, and sophisticated voting behavior in a legislative environment where the agenda is determined endogenously. Because of its apparent institution-free properties, the uncovered set may provide a useful generalization of the core when a core does not exist. A general existence theorem for the uncovered set is proven, and for the Downsian case, bounds for the uncovered set are computed. These bounds show that the uncovered set is centered around a generalized median set whose size is a measure of the degree of symmetry of the voter ideal points.

Additional Information

© 1986 Midwest Political Science Association. This research was supported in part by NSF grants No. SES-82-08184 and SES-84-09654 to the California Institute of Technology. I benefitted from discussion with Nicholas Miller, Ken Shepsle, and Barry Weingast. Section 5 of this paper began as joint work with Ken Shepsle and Barry Weingast. They have kindly permitted me to present it here. Formerly SSWP 494.

Additional details

Created:
August 19, 2023
Modified:
October 20, 2023