Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published November 28, 2017 | Supplemental Material + Published
Journal Article Open

Assigning chemoreceptors to chemosensory pathways in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Abstract

In contrast to Escherichia coli, a model organism for chemotaxis that has 5 chemoreceptors and a single chemosensory pathway, Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 has a much more complex chemosensory network, which consists of 26 chemoreceptors feeding into four chemosensory pathways. While several chemoreceptors were rigorously linked to specific pathways in a series of experimental studies, for most of them this information is not available. Thus, we addressed the problem computationally. Protein–protein interaction network prediction, coexpression data mining, and phylogenetic profiling all produced incomplete and uncertain assignments of chemoreceptors to pathways. However, comparative sequence analysis specifically targeting chemoreceptor regions involved in pathway interactions revealed conserved sequence patterns that enabled us to unambiguously link all 26 chemoreceptors to four pathways. Placing computational evidence in the context of experimental data allowed us to conclude that three chemosensory pathways in P. aeruginosa utilize one chemoreceptor per pathway, whereas the fourth pathway, which is the main system controlling chemotaxis, utilizes the other 23 chemoreceptors. Our results show that while only a very few amino acid positions in receptors, kinases, and adaptors determine their pathway specificity, assigning receptors to pathways computationally is possible. This requires substantial knowledge about interacting partners on a molecular level and focusing comparative sequence analysis on the pathway-specific regions. This general principle should be applicable to resolving many other receptor–pathway interactions.

Additional Information

© 2017 National Academy of Sciences. Edited by Eugene V. Koonin, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, and approved October 26, 2017 (received for review May 27, 2017). Published online before print November 13, 2017. We thank Jacob Pollack for technical assistance and Ariane Briegel for helpful discussions. This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants GM072295 (to I.B.Z.) and GM122588 (to G.J.J.). D.R.O. and A.D.F. contributed equally to this work. Author contributions: D.R.O., A.D.F., and I.B.Z. designed research; D.R.O. and A.D.F. performed research; D.R.O. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; D.R.O., A.D.F., T.K., C.S.H., G.J.J., and I.B.Z. analyzed data; and D.R.O., A.D.F., T.K., C.S.H., G.J.J., and I.B.Z. wrote the paper. The authors declare no conflict of interest. This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1708842114/-/DCSupplemental. Published under the PNAS license.

Attached Files

Published - PNAS-2017-Ortega-12809-14.pdf

Supplemental Material - pnas.1708842114.sd01.pdf

Supplemental Material - pnas.1708842114.sd02.pdf

Supplemental Material - pnas.1708842114.sd03.pdf

Supplemental Material - pnas.1708842114.sd04.pdf

Supplemental Material - pnas.201708842SI.pdf

Files

pnas.1708842114.sd01.pdf
Files (9.4 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:a612346e08254a6747fa1c7a48cd3a4c
160.7 kB Preview Download
md5:0eb58a8a54d9140b4370db861cbdedae
5.5 MB Preview Download
md5:72ed7bd98a4448f307119cd9895c89af
1.7 MB Preview Download
md5:7918f86da095cfb0b2b6a351a0152cb3
490.8 kB Preview Download
md5:2e01afdeb13ca5c27e6d33cee8962637
538.2 kB Preview Download
md5:c437c3acd576b57633614d9af8abadb5
1.0 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 21, 2023
Modified:
October 17, 2023