Published 1982
| public
Book Section - Chapter
Equilibrium, Disequilibrium, and the General Possibility of a Science of Politics
- Creators
- Fiorina, Morris P.
- Shepsle, Kenneth A.
Chicago
An error occurred while generating the citation.
Abstract
Perhaps it overstates matters to say that there is a crisis in formal political theory, but it is apparent that much mischief has been caused by a series of theorems that depict the chaotic features of majority-rule voting systems. These theorems, proved elegantly in recent papers by Cohen (1979), McKelvey (1976, 1979) and Schofield (1978), establish that the cyclicity of the majority preference relation is both generic and pervasive. To paraphrase the title of a recent paper by Bell (1978), when majority rule breaks down, it breaks down completely; and it "almost always" breaks down.
Additional Information
© 1982 Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing. The authors acknowledge comments on an earlier draft, ranging from constructive hostility to benign neglect, from Randall Calvert, John Ferejohn, Robert Parks, Charles Plott, Robert Salisbury, and Barry Weingast.Additional details
- Eprint ID
- 82236
- Resolver ID
- CaltechAUTHORS:20171009-154915736
- Created
-
2017-10-09Created from EPrint's datestamp field
- Updated
-
2021-11-15Created from EPrint's last_modified field