Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published October 4, 2017 | Submitted
Report Open

Who is Held Responsible? Further Evidence on the Hibbing-Alford Thesis

Abstract

Macroeconomic conditions clearly exert an impact on the electoral fortunes of the governing party, but little agreement exists about the micro-level mechanisms which underlie the aggregate relationships. In particular, efforts to base the aggregate level findings on the financial fortunes of individual voters have proved fruitless. Hibbing and Alford suggest, however, that previous studies have failed to differentiate among three types of in-party candidates—incumbents, open-seat candidates, and challengers of out-party incumbents—and that only in the first category should we find individual voters holding the in-party responsible. The strongest support for the argument consists of an analysis of 1978 survey data. This note replicates the Hibbing-Alford findings for 1978 using a different methodology, and provides additional analyses from five more election studies. In all, four of six elections yield a pattern of coefficients broadly consistent with the Hibbing-Alford thesis, but in only two elections—both on-year surprisingly enough—are the results on solid statistical ground.

Additional Information

I wish to thank [an anonymous referee] for helpful comments in an earlier version of this note. Published as Fiorina, Morris P. "Who is held responsible? Further evidence on the Hibbing-Alford thesis." American Journal of Political Science (1983): 158-164.

Attached Files

Submitted - sswp435.pdf

Files

sswp435.pdf
Files (169.6 kB)
Name Size Download all
md5:a5a01c044a24e68f1011a82e6a5075eb
169.6 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 19, 2023
Modified:
January 14, 2024