Invisible-Hand Explanations Reconsidered
- Creators
- Curren, Randall R.
Abstract
Edna Ullmann-Margalit introduced the notion of an invisible hand explanation (I-H explanation) to the philosophical literature in 1978, and made a distinction between "aggregate" and "functional-evolutionary" (F-E) forms of I-H explanations. The present paper produces a substantially refined analysis of the forms and functions of I-H explanations. Sections (1) and (2) introduce the ideas of I-H and aggregate I-H explanation, respectively. Section (J) argues that no one form of explanation can serve the explanatory functions Ullmanri-Margalit attributes to aggregate explanations, and divides those explanatory functions between genetic and "systematic-dispositional" explanations. Section (4) identifies difficulties with the idea of F-E explanation in the social realm, and shows that any I-H explanations fitting the F-E mold would constitute simply a special class of "aggregate" explanation.
Additional Information
I owe thanks to Edna Ullmann-Margalit, Merrilee Salmon, Sandra Mitchell, and especially Carl G. Hempel and Joseph Camp, for their encouragement and useful comments on earlier drafts of this paper. Paper was also put out as Humanities Working Paper 120.Attached Files
Submitted - sswp621.pdf
Files
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:582afd02e31ec8dd4bcffc8d57083e1d
|
469.9 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
- Eprint ID
- 81369
- Resolver ID
- CaltechAUTHORS:20170912-135330205
- Created
-
2017-09-12Created from EPrint's datestamp field
- Updated
-
2019-10-03Created from EPrint's last_modified field
- Caltech groups
- Social Science Working Papers
- Series Name
- Social Science Working Paper
- Series Volume or Issue Number
- 621