Resolving the model-observation discrepancy in the mesospheric and stratospheric HO_x chemistry
Abstract
We examine the middle atmospheric odd-hydrogen (HO_x) chemistry by comparing the Aura Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS) OH and HO_2 measurements with a photochemical model simulation. The model underestimates mesospheric OH and HO_2 concentrations if the standard chemical kinetic rates are used, whether the model H_2O and O_3 are constrained with observations or not. To resolve the discrepancies, we adjust the kinetic rate coefficients of three key reactions (O + OH → O_2 + H, OH + HO_2 → H_2O + O_2, and H + O_2 + M → HO_2 + M) and the O2photo absorption cross section at Lyman-α (121.57 nm) using the Bayesian optimal estimation. A much better model-observation agreement can be achieved if the kinetic rate coefficients for H + O_2 + M → HO_2 + M is increased by 134–310%, and the O_2 photo absorption cross section at Lyman-α is reduced by 33–54%, while the kinetic rate coefficients for O + OH → O_2 + H and OH + HO_2 → H_2O + O_2 remain consistent with the current laboratory values. The kinetic rate coefficient for H + O_2 + M → HO_2 + M requires a very large adjustment beyond the uncertainty limits recommended in the NASA Data Evaluation, suggesting the need for future laboratory measurements. An alternative explanation is that the radiative association reaction, H + O_2 → HO_2 + hν, plays a significant role, which has never been measured. Our results demonstrate that high quality satellite observations can be used to constrain photochemical parameters and help improve our understanding of atmospheric chemistry.
Additional Information
© 2017 American Geophysical Union. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. Received 12 APR 2017; Accepted 28 AUG 2017; Accepted article online 4 SEP 2017; Published online 27 SEP 2017. We thank P. Wennberg, R. -L. Shia, S. Newman, and P. Kopparla for helpful comments. We acknowledge the support of the NASA Aura Science Team. S. W., Q. Z., and Y. L. Y. acknowledge partial support by NASA's LWS Program grant NNX16AK63G. K. F. L. was supported partly by the Jack Eddy Fellowship managed by the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research and partly by the NASA grant NNX14AR40G. We thank the two anonymous reviewers, whose comments significantly improved this manuscript. Additional support was provided by the NASA Upper Atmosphere Research and Tropospheric Chemistry Programs. MLS data are available at https://mls.jpl.nasa.gov/products/oh_product.php.Attached Files
Published - ef5f63e0d1351e329eb0885a71ee7be833e87985d56cc600da66cf5caf924138.pdf
Accepted Version - Li_et_al-2017-Earth_and_Space_Science.pdf
Supplemental Material - ess2157-sup-0001-2017EA000283-S01.pdf
Files
Additional details
- Eprint ID
- 81117
- Resolver ID
- CaltechAUTHORS:20170905-074402925
- NASA
- NNX16AK63G
- University Corporation for Atmospheric Research
- NASA
- NNX14AR40G
- Created
-
2017-09-05Created from EPrint's datestamp field
- Updated
-
2021-11-15Created from EPrint's last_modified field
- Caltech groups
- Astronomy Department, Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences (GPS)