Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published August 28, 2017 | Submitted
Report Open

Notes on Constitutional Change in the ROC: Presidential versus Parliamentary Government

Abstract

The debate over constitutional reform has moved to center stage in Taiwan, with a focus on two issues: the choice of presidential versus parliamentary government and a determination of the ultimate role of the National Assembly. These two issues, in turn, are linked by a third -- whether the president ought to be elected indirectly by the National Assembly or directly in a mass popular vote. Of these issues, though, the choice between a presidential and a parliamentary system is central, because it requires that we consider the methods whereby chief executives and legislators are elected and, correspondingly, the role of the National Assembly. Beginning, then, with the issue of presidential versus parliamentary government, this essay argues that the most commonly cited arguments over the advisability of choosing one or the other of these two forms are, for the most part, theoretically meaningless and are largely rhetorical devices for rationalizing prejudices about preferred governmental structures and the state's role. Consequently, we attempt here to provide a more useful set of criteria with which to evaluate reform in general and the choice between presidential and parliamentary government in particular. We conclude that although the choice between presidential and parliamentary forms is important, equal attention should be given to the methods whereby a president and the legislature are elected. It is these institutional parameters that determine the character of political parties in Taiwan, their ability to accommodate any mainlander-native Taiwanese conflict, and the likelihood that executive and legislative branches will formulate coherent domestic and international policy.

Additional Information

The research represented by this essay, written for the "Conference on Democratic Institutions in East Asia," Duke University, Durham, NC (April 2-4, 1993), was supported by a grant from the Pacific Culture Foundation. Forthcoming: Chinese Political Science Review

Attached Files

Submitted - sswp869.pdf

Files

sswp869.pdf
Files (330.4 kB)
Name Size Download all
md5:764a401ec9b78e025798cd0decc75385
330.4 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 20, 2023
Modified:
January 14, 2024