Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published August 11, 2017 | Submitted
Report Open

Coalition and Party Formation in a Legislative Voting Game

Abstract

We examine a legislative voting game where decisions are being made over both ideological and distributive dimensions, and legislators' preferences are separable over the two dimensions. In equilibrium legislators prefer to make proposals for the two dimensions together, rather than offering sequential proposals on the two dimensions separately. The equilibria exhibit interaction between the ideological and distributive dimensions and in any equilibrium there is a positive probability that a proposal is made and approved which excludes the median legislator (as defined over the ideological dimension), in contrast with a game where no distributive decision is being made. Moreover, in any stationary equilibrium there is more than one ideological decision that has a positive probability of being proposed and approved. We show that legislators can gain from forming political parties, and consider examples where predictions can be made about the composition of parties. We discuss the impact of political parties on the outcome.

Additional Information

Financial support under NSF grant SBR-9507912 is gratefully acknowledged. We thank David Austen-Smith, Tim Feddersen, Richard McKelvey, and Roger Myerson for helpful comments and discussions, and Steve Callander for calculations on one of the examples. Published as Jackson, M.O., & Moselle, B. (2002). Coalition and party formation in a legislative voting game. Journal of Economic Theory, 103(1), 49-87.

Attached Files

Submitted - sswp1036.pdf

Files

sswp1036.pdf
Files (363.8 kB)
Name Size Download all
md5:9215e7e93980d62032b58b1d96d62112
363.8 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 19, 2023
Modified:
January 14, 2024