An axiomatic theory of political representation
- Creators
-
Chambers, Christopher P.
Abstract
We discuss the theory of voting rules which are immune to gerrymandering. Our approach is axiomatic. We show that any rule that is unanimous, anonymous, and representative consistent must decide a social alternative as a function of the proportions of agents voting for each alternative, and must either be independent of this proportion, or be in one-to-one correspondence with the proportions. In an extended model in which voters can vote over elements of the unit interval, we introduce and characterize the quasi-proportional rules based on unanimity, anonymity, representative consistency, strict monotonicity, and continuity. We show that we can always (pointwise) approximate a single-member district quota rule with a quasi-proportional rule. We also establish that upon weakening strict monotonicity, the generalized target rules emerge.
Additional Information
I would like to thank participants of the 2004 Meeting of the Society of Economic Design, and from the joint Harvard/MIT Economic Theory seminar.Attached Files
Submitted - sswp1218.pdf
Files
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:49868fea08c45cd3f818cff97c2327ea
|
412.5 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
- Eprint ID
- 80002
- Resolver ID
- CaltechAUTHORS:20170809-092845210
- Created
-
2017-08-09Created from EPrint's datestamp field
- Updated
-
2020-03-09Created from EPrint's last_modified field
- Caltech groups
- Social Science Working Papers
- Series Name
- Social Science Working Paper
- Series Volume or Issue Number
- 1218