Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published August 1, 2017 | Submitted
Report Open

Hedonism vs. Nihilism: No Arbitrage and Tests of Urban Economic Models

Abstract

We present two notions of "no arbitrage" in urban economic models and show that there is no model satisfying both. The standard hedonic housing model of urban economics and its generalizations are consistent with the first of these, but inconsistent with the second. We present a model consistent with the second notion of "no arbitrage" and a continuum of models consistent with neither notion that are observationally equivalent to the standard model, even if the utility function of consumers is known. Only one of these is the standard model. Thus, the available tests of the standard model cannot provide much evidence of its validity. Finally, we examine nonlinear price systems consistent with the second notion of "no arbitrage" and their welfare consequences.

Additional Information

The authors thank participants at the real estate seminar of the Haas School of Business at the University of California, Berkeley. The authors also thank Jan Brueckner, Ed Coulson, John Nachbar, Bob Pollak, Paul Rothstein, Suzanne Scotchmer, Jacques Thisse, Nancy Wallace and particularly David Pines for helpful comments. The first author gratefully acknowledges financial support from the American Philosophical Society. Published as Berliant, M., & McMillen, D.P. (2006). Hedonism vs. nihilism: No arbitrage and tests of urban economic models. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 36(1), 118-131.

Attached Files

Submitted - sswp1166.pdf

Files

sswp1166.pdf
Files (275.9 kB)
Name Size Download all
md5:7b1a641a97dd00f9be7b0ebb84bd46a2
275.9 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 19, 2023
Modified:
January 13, 2024