Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published July 10, 2017 | Supplemental Material + Published
Journal Article Open

Intraspecific variability in Phaeocystis antarctica's response to iron and light stress

Abstract

Phaeocystis antarctica is an abundant phytoplankton species in the Southern Ocean, where growth is frequently limited by iron and light. Being able to grow under low iron conditions is essential to the species' success, but there have been hints that this ability differs among clones. Here, we compare the growth, cell size and chlorophyll a concentrations of four P. antarctica clones cultured under different iron and light conditions. Iron was provided either as unchelated iron (Fe′) or bound to the bacterial siderophore desferrioxamine B, representing, respectively, the most and least bioavailable forms of iron which phytoplankton encounter in the marine environment. The growth rate data demonstrate that the clones vary in their ability to grow using organically bound iron, and that this ability is not related to their ability to grow at low inorganic iron concentrations. These results are consistent at low and high light. Physiologically, only three of the four clones shrink or decrease the concentration of chlorophyll a in response to iron limitation, and only one clone decreases colony formation. Together, our data show that P. antarctica clones 1) respond to the same degree of iron limitation using different acclimation strategies, and 2) vary in their ability to grow under the same external iron and light conditions. This physiological diversity is surprisingly large for isolates of a single phytoplankton species.

Additional Information

© 2017 Luxem et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Received: November 27, 2016; Accepted: June 2, 2017; Published: July 10, 2017. Data Availability Statement: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files. KEL was supported by the Robert and Delpha Noland Summer Internship, which funded her travel to and accommodation in Australia. The Australian Research Council (DP130100679 to MJE) is acknowledged for funds to support this study. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. Author Contributions: Conceptualization: Katja E. Luxem, Michael J. Ellwood, Robert F. Strzepek. Formal analysis: Katja E. Luxem. Investigation: Katja E. Luxem, Robert F. Strzepek. Methodology: Katja E. Luxem, Michael J. Ellwood, Robert F. Strzepek. Visualization: Katja E. Luxem. Writing ± original draft: Katja E. Luxem. Writing ± review & editing: Katja E. Luxem, Michael J. Ellwood, Robert F. Strzepek.

Attached Files

Published - journal.pone.0179751.pdf

Supplemental Material - S1Table.docx

Supplemental Material - S2Table.docx

Supplemental Material - S3Table.docx

Supplemental Material - S4Table.docx

Supplemental Material - S5Table.docx

Files

journal.pone.0179751.pdf
Files (1.6 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:b4b4f0b343b5d5b65c147055be091850
28.6 kB Download
md5:92614c08c70e1c93d3595c74362d832d
27.8 kB Download
md5:b69a33024b5e3a57b4dd2b273f6ca6df
1.5 MB Preview Download
md5:bd33ec6e983d715f779da91b65b6d988
28.7 kB Download
md5:b841b3ab47ac93d82aaf50d4985ea767
28.8 kB Download
md5:152b90a1613bdcf0697866c0a756e36b
28.3 kB Download

Additional details

Created:
August 19, 2023
Modified:
October 23, 2023