Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published July 10, 2017 | Supplemental Material + Published
Journal Article Open

The Pawnee earthquake as a result of the interplay among injection, faults and foreshocks

Abstract

The Pawnee M5.8 earthquake is the largest event in Oklahoma instrument recorded history. It occurred near the edge of active seismic zones, similar to other M5+ earthquakes since 2011. It ruptured a previously unmapped fault and triggered aftershocks along a complex conjugate fault system. With a high-resolution earthquake catalog, we observe propagating foreshocks leading to the mainshock within 0.5 km distance, suggesting existence of precursory aseismic slip. At approximately 100 days before the mainshock, two M ≥ 3.5 earthquakes occurred along a mapped fault that is conjugate to the mainshock fault. At about 40 days before, two earthquakes clusters started, with one M3 earthquake occurred two days before the mainshock. The three M ≥ 3 foreshocks all produced positive Coulomb stress at the mainshock hypocenter. These foreshock activities within the conjugate fault system are near-instantaneously responding to variations in injection rates at 95% confidence. The short time delay between injection and seismicity differs from both the hypothetical expected time scale of diffusion process and the long time delay observed in this region prior to 2016, suggesting a possible role of elastic stress transfer and critical stress state of the fault. Our results suggest that the Pawnee earthquake is a result of interplay among injection, tectonic faults, and foreshocks.

Additional Information

© 2017 The Author(s). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Received: 31 October 2016; Accepted: 23 May 2017; Published online: 10 July 2017. We thank the Oklahoma Geological Survey (OGS) and USGS for continuous monitoring earthquake activities in Oklahoma. The fault database is compiled by OGS. The catalogs for earthquake and fault plane solutions are obtained from the OGS. The earthquake waveforms are downloaded from IRIS DMC. The disposal well data are obtained from the Oklahoma Corporation Commission (OCC) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Last access of SLU moment solutions, GCMT solutions, USGS body wave solutions on Sep 28, 2016. This research was supported by the ConocoPhillips School of Geology and Geophysics, and the OGS at the University of Oklahoma. The maps are generated with MATLAB (version 2014b and later). The Coulomb stress analysis is performed with Coulomb 3.4 software, available at: usgsprojects.org/coulomb/. Author Contributions: X.C. wrote the manuscript, led the data analysis and interpretation. N.N. produced maps for visualization of spatial-temporal pattern. C.P. analyzed Coulomb stress. J.H. compiled injection data and analyzed the statewide seismicity distribution. J.C. provided the original catalog, phase picks and compiled geological information. X.H., Z.Z. and S.N. analyzed the source process for the mainshock. J.I.W. conducted the network matched-filter analysis. All authors contributed to the discussion and commented on the manuscript. The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Attached Files

Published - redirect-nature.pdf

Supplemental Material - 41598_2017_4992_MOESM1_ESM.mov

Supplemental Material - 41598_2017_4992_MOESM2_ESM.pdf

Supplemental Material - 41598_2017_4992_MOESM3_ESM.csv

Files

41598_2017_4992_MOESM2_ESM.pdf
Files (23.3 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:2b5b75f4cb65c8862d5d4d64344a6b82
205.4 kB Download
md5:f7dc83dfb3ee7ba5975dd35cf886255a
18.3 MB Preview Download
md5:78490e025c361003a19ea98d903b8d4e
58.1 kB Preview Download
md5:80f93763a62dadf19486c285cf6096ba
4.7 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 22, 2023
Modified:
October 26, 2023