Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published August 15, 2017 | Supplemental Material + Published
Journal Article Open

Characterizing Aggregated Exposure to Primary Particulate Matter: Recommended Intake Fractions for Indoor and Outdoor Sources

Abstract

Exposure to fine particulate matter (PM_(2.5)) from indoor and outdoor sources is a leading environmental contributor to global disease burden. In response, we established under the auspices of the UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative a coupled indoor-outdoor emission-to-exposure framework to provide a set of consistent primary PM_(2.5) aggregated exposure factors. We followed a matrix-based mass balance approach for quantifying exposure from indoor and ground-level urban and rural outdoor sources using an effective indoor-outdoor population intake fraction and a system of archetypes to represent different levels of spatial detail. Emission-to-exposure archetypes range from global indoor and outdoor averages, via archetypal urban and indoor settings, to 3646 real-world cities in 16 parametrized subcontinental regions. Population intake fractions from urban and rural outdoor sources are lowest in Northern regions and Oceania and highest in Southeast Asia with population-weighted means across 3646 cities and 16 subcontinental regions of, respectively, 39 ppm (95% confidence interval: 4.3–160 ppm) and 2 ppm (95% confidence interval: 0.2–6.3 ppm). Intake fractions from residential and occupational indoor sources range from 470 ppm to 62 000 ppm, mainly as a function of air exchange rate and occupancy. Indoor exposure typically contributes 80–90% to overall exposure from outdoor sources. Our framework facilitates improvements in air pollution reduction strategies and life cycle impact assessments.

Additional Information

© 2017 American Chemical Society. This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License, which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes. Received: May 19, 2017; Revised: July 6, 2017; Accepted: July 6, 2017; Published: July 6, 2017. We thank Jeffrey Siegel, Deborah Bennett, Jouni Tuomisto, Marko Tainio, and Michael Brauer for their manuscript comments and data inputs. This work was financially supported by the UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative and by the Marie Curie project Quan-Tox (grant agreement no. 631910) funded by the European Commission under the Seventh 556 Framework Programme. The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Attached Files

Published - acs.est.7b02589.pdf

Supplemental Material - es7b02589_si_001.pdf

Supplemental Material - es7b02589_si_002.zip

Files

acs.est.7b02589.pdf
Files (4.7 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:0afb0608e839dd11cdab232696f58b0b
2.1 MB Preview Download
md5:25e22f9156d97aebab20df71b6978cca
485.7 kB Preview Download
md5:e6430d2c9379cd97b1231e6decafbb40
2.1 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 19, 2023
Modified:
October 26, 2023