Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published October 7, 2004 | Supplemental Material
Journal Article Open

Assessment of Handy−Cohen Optimized Exchange Density Functional (OPTX)

Abstract

In this paper we present a systematic assessment of the Handy−Cohen optimized exchange density functional (OPTX), comparing results from OLYP and O3LYP with those from BLYP and B3LYP. We find that OPTX significantly outperforms Becke88 in the calculations of the atomic exchange energies, and O3LYP leads to the best total atomic energies (H to Ar) among these four functions. We find OLYP and O3LYP are competitive or even better than BLYP and B3LYP in the predictions of ionization potentials, electron affinities, and proton affinities against the extended G2 set of 75 atoms and molecules. For thermochemistry of the extended G2 set of 148 molecules, we find that the mean absolute deviation (in kcal/mol) follows the order BLYP (7.10) > OLYP (4.66) > O3LYP (4.13) > B3LYP (3.14). Thus OLYP is the best pure DFT, but B3LYP is the best overall. The histogram of error distribution of the G2 set indicates that O3LYP has more predictive power than B3LYP, although O3LYP has a tendency for overbinding. OLYP and O3LYP significantly outperform BLYP and B3LYP in describing van der Waals interactions, but OLYP and O3LYP underestimate hydrogen bond strengths even more than BLYP and B3LYP and, hence, cannot be recommended for studying hydrogen bond systems.

Additional Information

© 2004 American Chemical Society. Received: June 14, 2004; In Final Form: July 27, 2004. Publication Date (Web): September 15, 2004. This research was funded by DOE (ASCI), National Institutes of Health (HD 36385-02), National Natural Science Foundation of China (20021002), National Natural Science Foundation of Fujian (2002F010), the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2001CB610506) and TRAPOYT from the Ministry of Education of China. The facilities of the Materials and Process Simulation Center (MSC) used in these studies were funded by DURIP-ARO, DURIP-ONR, IBM (SUR), NSF (MRI), and the Beckman Institute. In addition, the MSC is funded by grants from DOE-FETL, ARO-MURI, ONR-MURI, NIH, ChevronTexaco, Aventis Pharma, General Motors, Seiko-Epson, Berlex Biopharma, and Asahi Kasei.

Attached Files

Supplemental Material - jp047428v_s.pdf

Files

jp047428v_s.pdf
Files (181.9 kB)
Name Size Download all
md5:965ef7709d369962c4d8af5896b1e567
181.9 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 19, 2023
Modified:
October 25, 2023