Published July 15, 2004 | public
Journal Article

Thermodynamic Properties of Multifunctional Oxygenates in Atmospheric Aerosols from Quantum Mechanics and Molecular Dynamics: Dicarboxylic Acids

An error occurred while generating the citation.

Abstract

Ambient particulate matter contains polar multifunctional oxygenates that partition between the vapor and aerosol phases. Vapor pressure predictions are required to determine the gas−particle partitioning of such organic compounds. We present here a method based on atomistic simulations combined with the Clausius−Clapeyron equation to predict the liquid vapor pressure, enthalpies of vaporization, and heats of sublimation of atmospheric organic compounds. The resulting temperature-dependent vapor pressure equation is a function of the heat of vaporization at the normal boiling point [ΔH_(vap)(T_b)], normal boiling point (T_b), and the change in heat capacity (liquid to gas) of the compound upon phase change [ΔC_p(T_b)]. We show that heats of vaporization can be estimated from calculated cohesive energy densities (CED) of the pure compound obtained from multiple sampling molecular dynamics. The simulation method (CED) uses a generic force field (Dreiding) and molecular models with atomic charges determined from quantum mechanics. The heats of vaporization of five dicarboxylic acids [malonic (C_3), succinic (C_4), glutaric (C_5), adipic (C_6), and pimelic (C_7)] are calculated at 500 K. Results are in agreement with experimental values with an averaged error of about 4%. The corresponding heats of sublimation at 298 K are also predicted using molecular simulations. Vapor pressures of the five dicarboxylic acids are also predicted using the derived Clausius−Clapeyron equation. Predicted liquid vapor pressures agree well with available literature data with an averaged error of 29%, while the predicted solid vapor pressures at ambient temperature differ considerably from a recent study by Bilde et al. (Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 1371−1378) (an average of 70%). The difference is attributed to the linear dependence assumption that we used in the derived Clausius−Clapeyron equation.

Additional Information

© 2004 American Chemical Society. Received for review December 18, 2003. Revised manuscript received April 26, 2004. Accepted May 4, 2004. Publication Date (Web): June 11, 2004. This work was supported by National Science Foundation/Environmental Protection Agency Program TSE99-G No. 9985578 and the Electric Power Research Institute. We thank Dr. Shiang-Tai Lin and Rachel Niemer for their valuable discussions and suggestions. The facilities of the Materials and Process Simulation Center used in these calculations have been funded by DURIP-ONR, DURIP-ARO, NSF-MRI, and IBM (SUR Grant).

Additional details

Created:
August 19, 2023
Modified:
October 25, 2023