Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published November 2016 | Supplemental Material + Published
Journal Article Open

The temperature of the Icelandic mantle from olivine-spinel aluminum exchange thermometry

Abstract

New crystallization temperatures for four eruptions from the Northern Volcanic Zone of Iceland are determined using olivine-spinel aluminum exchange thermometry. Differences in the olivine crystallization temperatures between these eruptions are consistent with variable extents of cooling during fractional crystallization. However, the crystallization temperatures for Iceland are systematically offset to higher temperatures than equivalent olivine-spinel aluminum exchange crystallization temperatures published for MORB, an effect that cannot be explained by fractional crystallization. The highest observed crystallization temperature in Iceland is 1399 ± 20°C. In order to convert crystallization temperatures to mantle potential temperature, we developed a model of multilithology mantle melting that tracks the thermal evolution of the mantle during isentropic decompression melting. With this model, we explore the controls on the temperature at which primary melts begin to crystallize, as a function of source composition and the depth from which the magmas are derived. Large differences (200°C) in crystallization temperature can be generated by variations in mantle lithology, a magma's inferred depth of origin, and its thermal history. Combining this model with independent constraints on the magma volume flux and the effect of lithological heterogeneity on melt production, restricted regions of potential temperature-lithology space can be identified as consistent with the observed crystallization temperatures. Mantle potential temperature is constrained to be 1480^(+37)_(-30)°C for Iceland and 1318^(+44)_(-32)°C for MORB.

Additional Information

© 2016 American Geophysical Union. Received 21 JUN 2016; Accepted 3 NOV 2016; Accepted article online 7 NOV 2016; Published online 24 NOV 2016. Supporting information Table S1 contains average chemical data and thermometry results for each crystal pair studied. The authors thank A. Thomson and L. Tweed for preparing sample mounts, E. Jennings and J. Rudge for helpful discussions about Al-exchange thermometry and the thermal model, and I. Buisman for her assistance with the EPMA analyses. G. Fitton, K. Putirka, and E. Brown are thanked for their insightful reviews of the manuscript. In addition, informal reviews from M. Hartley and D. Neave greatly improved the text. S.M. was supported by a Natural Environment Research Council Studentship (NE/L002507/1 and NE/M000427/1). J.M. was supported by a Natural Environment Research Council grant (NE/J021539/1). O.S. was supported by a Title A Fellowship from Trinity College Cambridge and a Geology Option Postdoctoral Fellowship at Caltech.

Attached Files

Published - Matthews_et_al-2016-Geochemistry,_Geophysics,_Geosystems.pdf

Supplemental Material - ggge21185-sup-0001-2016GC006497-s01.pdf

Supplemental Material - ggge21185-sup-0002-2016GC006497-ds01.xls

Files

Matthews_et_al-2016-Geochemistry,_Geophysics,_Geosystems.pdf
Files (3.9 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:8a4baba03f4dde6642de8285acbc8e4b
3.8 MB Preview Download
md5:5e21617904693569815c42719025c920
67.3 kB Preview Download
md5:3860a20441122888b6b1fc5589e05e99
35.3 kB Download

Additional details

Created:
August 22, 2023
Modified:
October 24, 2023