Published April 16, 1998
| Submitted
Journal Article
Open
Why matrix theory is hard
- Creators
- Douglas, Michael R.
-
Ooguri, Hirosi
Chicago
An error occurred while generating the citation.
Abstract
Recently Sen and Seiberg gave a prescription for constructing the matrix theory in any superstring background. We use their prescription to test the finite N matrix theory conjecture on an ALE space. Based on our earlier work with Shenker, we find a sharper discrepancy between matrix theory computation and supergravity prediction. We discuss subtleties in the light-front quantization which may lead to a resolution to the discrepancy.
Additional Information
© 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. Received 29 October 1997. We would like to thank Tom Banks, Kiyoshi Higashijima, Ashoke Sen, Koichi Yamawaki and, in particular, Steve Shenker for discussion. H.O. is supported in part by NSF grant PHY-951497 and DOE grant DE-AC03-76SF00098.Attached Files
Submitted - 9710178.pdf
Files
9710178.pdf
Files
(122.5 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:c1694e772724fff2c2544c290c360a07
|
122.5 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
- Eprint ID
- 73090
- DOI
- 10.1016/S0370-2693(98)00114-2
- Resolver ID
- CaltechAUTHORS:20161221-124148504
- NSF
- PHY-951497
- Department of Energy (DOE)
- DE-AC03-76SF00098
- Created
-
2016-12-21Created from EPrint's datestamp field
- Updated
-
2021-11-11Created from EPrint's last_modified field