Ongoing evolution of proposal reviews in the Spitzer warm mission
Abstract
The Spitzer Space Telescope is executing the seventh year of extended warm mission science. The cryogenic mission operated from 2003 to 2009. The observing proposal review process has evolved from large, week-long, in-person meetings during the cryogenic mission to the introduction of panel telecon reviews in the warm mission. Further compression of the schedule and budget for the proposal solicitation and selection process led to additional changes in 2014. Large proposals are still reviewed at an in-person meeting but smaller proposals are no longer discussed by a topical science panel. This hybrid process, involving an in-person committee for the larger proposals and strictly external reviewers for the smaller proposals, has been successfully implemented through two observing cycles. While people like the idea of not having to travel to a review it is still the consensus opinion, in our discussions with the community, that the in-person review panel discussions provide the most satisfying result. We continue to use in-person reviews for awarding greater than 90% of the observing time.
Additional Information
© 2016 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).Attached Files
Published - 991012.pdf
Files
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:c304de6422675411255018f7dc269112
|
417.0 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
- Eprint ID
- 72093
- Resolver ID
- CaltechAUTHORS:20161117-075749762
- NASA
- NNG08FD60C
- Created
-
2016-11-17Created from EPrint's datestamp field
- Updated
-
2021-11-11Created from EPrint's last_modified field
- Caltech groups
- Infrared Processing and Analysis Center (IPAC)
- Series Name
- Proceedings of SPIE
- Series Volume or Issue Number
- 9910