MCMC Methods for Functions: Modifying Old Algorithms to Make Them Faster
Abstract
Many problems arising in applications result in the need to probe a probability distribution for functions. Examples include Bayesian nonparametric statistics and conditioned diffusion processes. Standard MCMC algorithms typically become arbitrarily slow under the mesh refinement dictated by nonparametric description of the unknown function. We describe an approach to modifying a whole range of MCMC methods, applicable whenever the target measure has density with respect to a Gaussian process or Gaussian random field reference measure, which ensures that their speed of convergence is robust under mesh refinement. Gaussian processes or random fields are fields whose marginal distributions, when evaluated at any finite set of NNpoints, are ℝ^N-valued Gaussians. The algorithmic approach that we describe is applicable not only when the desired probability measure has density with respect to a Gaussian process or Gaussian random field reference measure, but also to some useful non-Gaussian reference measures constructed through random truncation. In the applications of interest the data is often sparse and the prior specification is an essential part of the overall modelling strategy. These Gaussian-based reference measures are a very flexible modelling tool, finding wide-ranging application. Examples are shown in density estimation, data assimilation in fluid mechanics, subsurface geophysics and image registration. The key design principle is to formulate the MCMC method so that it is, in principle, applicable for functions; this may be achieved by use of proposals based on carefully chosen time-discretizations of stochastic dynamical systems which exactly preserve the Gaussian reference measure. Taking this approach leads to many new algorithms which can be implemented via minor modification of existing algorithms, yet which show enormous speed-up on a wide range of applied problems.
Additional Information
© 2013 Institute of Mathematical Statistics. S. L. Cotter is supported by EPSRC, ERC (FP7/2007-2013 and Grant 239870) and St. Cross College. G. O. Roberts is supported by EPSRC (especially the CRiSM grant). A. M. Stuart is grateful to EPSRC, ERC and ONR for the financial support of research which underpins this article. D. White is supported by ERC.Attached Files
Published - stuart103.pdf
Submitted - 1202.0709.pdf
Files
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:cc4f6df987de2e4beaf7f0f43881e8b6
|
1.3 MB | Preview Download |
md5:ae6414dc1f2358183b98a9f17ad2e635
|
1.7 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
- Eprint ID
- 69261
- Resolver ID
- CaltechAUTHORS:20160727-155941152
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
- European Research Council (ERC)
- FP7/2007-2013
- European Research Council (ERC)
- 239870
- St. Cross College
- Office of Naval Research (ONR)
- Created
-
2016-07-28Created from EPrint's datestamp field
- Updated
-
2021-11-11Created from EPrint's last_modified field
- Other Numbering System Name
- Andrew Stuart
- Other Numbering System Identifier
- J103