Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published May 20, 2016 | Published + Supplemental Material
Journal Article Open

Experimental river delta size set by multiple floods and backwater hydrodynamics

Abstract

River deltas worldwide are currently under threat of drowning and destruction by sea-level rise, subsidence, and oceanic storms, highlighting the need to quantify their growth processes. Deltas are built through construction of sediment lobes, and emerging theories suggest that the size of delta lobes scales with backwater hydrodynamics, but these ideas are difficult to test on natural deltas that evolve slowly. We show results of the first laboratory delta built through successive deposition of lobes that maintain a constant size. We show that the characteristic size of delta lobes emerges because of a preferential avulsion node—the location where the river course periodically and abruptly shifts—that remains fixed spatially relative to the prograding shoreline. The preferential avulsion node in our experiments is a consequence of multiple river floods and Froude-subcritical flows that produce persistent nonuniform flows and a peak in net channel deposition within the backwater zone of the coastal river. In contrast, experimental deltas without multiple floods produce flows with uniform velocities and delta lobes that lack a characteristic size. Results have broad applications to sustainable management of deltas and for decoding their stratigraphic record on Earth and Mars.

Additional Information

© 2016 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC). Submitted 4 December 2015; Accepted 26 April 2016; Published 20 May 2016. Acknowledgments: Critical and constructive comments from C. Paola, D. Mohrig, K. Whipple, D. Edmonds, and D. Jerolmack on an earlier draft improved the presentation of this work. Funding: We acknowledge support from NSF (grants OCE-1233685 and 1427177) and the California Institute Technology Terrestrial Hazards Observations and Reporting Center program made possible by Foster and Coco Stanback. V.G. acknowledges further support from National Center for Earth-Surface Dynamics 2 synthesis postdoctoral fellowship and the Imperial College London Junior Research Fellowship. Author contributions: M.P.L. and V.G. conceived the study and designed the experiments. All authors helped perform the experiments and analyze the data. V.G. and M.P.L. wrote the paper with input from other authors. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Data and materials availability: All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. Additional data related to this paper are available upon request from V.G. and A.J.C.

Attached Files

Published - e1501768.full.pdf

Supplemental Material - 1501768_Movie_S1.mp4

Supplemental Material - 1501768_Movie_S2.mp4

Supplemental Material - 1501768_Movie_S3.mov

Supplemental Material - 1501768_SM.pdf

Files

e1501768.full.pdf
Files (144.8 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:a23dc3073294a3d664b249b3add2c4da
119.0 MB Download
md5:9adf9fa95e7532589551d97bb8f04c4e
3.5 MB Download
md5:b7907ce273eb4a2c8ebd2ed9eae5de58
982.3 kB Preview Download
md5:f736cc028ecc18261619aa70b37418bf
9.0 MB Download
md5:742f8bed4607f8d3cb464d0577ea210e
12.3 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 22, 2023
Modified:
October 20, 2023