Suppression of Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation Variability at Increased CO_2
Abstract
Multidecadal variability in the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) is shown to differ significantly between the 4 × CO_2 and preindustrial control simulations of the GFDL Earth System Model, version 2M (ESM2M) general circulation model (GCM). In the preindustrial simulation, this model has a peak in the power spectrum of both AMOC and northward heat transport at latitudes between 26° and 50°N. In the 4 × CO_2 simulation, the only significant spectral peak is near 60°N. Understanding these differences is important for understanding the effect of future climate change on climate variability, as well as for providing insight into the physics underlying AMOC variability. Transfer function analysis demonstrates that the shift is predominantly due to a shift in the internal ocean dynamics rather than a change in stochastic atmospheric forcing. Specifically, the reduction in variance from 26° to 45°N is due to an increased stratification east of Newfoundland that results from the shallower and weaker mean overturning. The reduced AMOC variance that accompanies the reduced mean value of the AMOC at 4 × CO_2 differs from predictions of simple box models that predict a weaker circulation to be closer to a stability bifurcation point and, therefore, be accompanied by amplified variability. The high-latitude variability in the 4 × CO_2 simulation is related to the advection of anomalies by the subpolar gyre, distinct from the variability mechanism in the control simulation at lower latitudes. The 4 × CO_2 variability has only a small effect on midlatitude meridional heat transport, but does significantly affect sea ice in the northern North Atlantic.
Additional Information
© 2016 American Meteorological Society. Manuscript received 29 July 2015, in final form 26 February 2016. Published online: 20 May, 2016. DGM and ET were supported by NOAAA wards NA13OAR4310129 and NA13OAR4310130, respectively, and by DOE Award DE-SC004984; LZ was supported by NERC Grant NE/K013548/1. We thank the GFDL climate modeling group for producing and making available their model output. ET thanks the Weizmann institute for its hospitality during parts of this work. DGM thanks the Carnegie Institution for its hospitality during parts of this work.Attached Files
Published - jcli-d-15-0533.1.pdf
Supplemental Material - 10_2E1175_jcli-d-15-0533_2Es1.pdf
Files
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:c8f2f50e02c648ac5af9468ec898d4e3
|
348.0 kB | Preview Download |
md5:b5f9607703fc2fe36f7dc614ee9dec5f
|
1.9 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
- Eprint ID
- 67842
- Resolver ID
- CaltechAUTHORS:20160610-125102355
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
- NA13OAR4310129
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
- NA13OAR4310130
- Department of Energy (DOE)
- DE-SC004984
- Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)
- NE/K013548/1
- Created
-
2016-06-10Created from EPrint's datestamp field
- Updated
-
2021-11-11Created from EPrint's last_modified field