Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published March 17, 2015 | Supplemental Material + Published
Journal Article Open

The second laws of quantum thermodynamics

Abstract

The second law of thermodynamics places constraints on state transformations. It applies to systems composed of many particles, however, we are seeing that one can formulate laws of thermodynamics when only a small number of particles are interacting with a heat bath. Is there a second law of thermodynamics in this regime? Here, we find that for processes which are approximately cyclic, the second law for microscopic systems takes on a different form compared to the macroscopic scale, imposing not just one constraint on state transformations, but an entire family of constraints. We find a family of free energies which generalize the traditional one, and show that they can never increase. The ordinary second law relates to one of these, with the remainder imposing additional constraints on thermodynamic transitions. We find three regimes which determine which family of second laws govern state transitions, depending on how cyclic the process is. In one regime one can cause an apparent violation of the usual second law, through a process of embezzling work from a large system which remains arbitrarily close to its original state. These second laws are relevant for small systems, and also apply to individual macroscopic systems interacting via long-range interactions. By making precise the definition of thermal operations, the laws of thermodynamics are unified in this framework, with the first law defining the class of operations, the zeroth law emerging as an equivalence relation between thermal states, and the remaining laws being monotonicity of our generalized free energies.

Additional Information

© 2015 National Academy of Sciences. Edited by Peter W. Shor, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, and approved January 12, 2015 (received for review June 26, 2014). Published ahead of print February 9, 2015. We thank Robert Alicki, Piotr Cwiklinski, Milan Mosonyi, Sandu Popescu, Joe Renes, Marco Tomamichel, and Andreas Winter for useful discussions, and Max Frenzel for comments on our draft. J.O. is supported by the Royal Society. M.H. is supported by the Foundation for Polish Science TEAM project cofinanced by the European Union European Regional Development Fund. N.N. and S.W. are supported by the National Research Foundation and Ministry of Education (MOE), Singapore as well as MOE Tier 3 Grant "Random numbers from quantum processes" (MOE2012-T3-1-009). Author contributions: F.B., M.H., N.N., J.O., and S.W. performed research and wrote the paper. The authors declare no conflict of interest. This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1411728112/-/DCSupplemental.

Attached Files

Published - PNAS-2015-Brandão-3275-9.pdf

Supplemental Material - pnas.1411728112.sapp.pdf

Files

PNAS-2015-Brandão-3275-9.pdf
Files (1.2 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:cd0799e604bb03d26134a3cd12d577f5
712.9 kB Preview Download
md5:9718b119ab2b84ef6cfc033e2c1baf7e
516.6 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 22, 2023
Modified:
October 18, 2023