Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published February 2016 | Published + Supplemental Material
Journal Article Open

Rupture characteristics of major and great (M_w  ≥ 7.0) megathrust earthquakes from 1990 to 2015: 1. Source parameter scaling relationships

Abstract

Source parameter scaling for major and great thrust-faulting events on circum-Pacific megathrusts is examined using uniformly processed finite-fault inversions and radiated energy estimates for 114 M_w ≥ 7.0 earthquakes. To address the limited resolution of source spatial extent and rupture expansion velocity (V_r) from teleseismic observations, the events are subdivided into either group 1 (18 events) having independent constraints on V_r from prior studies or group 2 (96 events) lacking independent V_r constraints. For group 2, finite-fault inversions with V_r = 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 km/s are performed. The product V_r^3Δσ_E, with stress drop Δσ_E calculated for the slip distribution in the inverted finite-fault models, is very stable for each event across the suite of models considered. It has little trend with M_w, although there is a baseline shift to low values for large tsunami earthquakes. Source centroid time (T_c) and duration (T_d), measured from the finite-fault moment rate functions vary systematically with the cube root of seismic moment (M_0), independent of assumed V_r. There is no strong dependence on magnitude or Vr for moment-scaled radiated energy (E_R/M_0) or apparent stress (σ_a). Δσ_E averages ~4 MPa, with direct trade-off between V_r and estimated stress drop but little dependence on M_w. Similar behavior is found for radiation efficiency (η_R). We use V_r^3Δσ_E and T_c/M_0^(1/3) to explore variation of stress drop, V_r and radiation efficiency, along with finite-source geometrical factors. Radiation efficiency tends to decrease with average slip for these very large events, and fracture energy increases steadily with slip.

Additional Information

© 2016 American Geophysical Union. Received 6 AUG 2015; Accepted 6 JAN 2016; Accepted article online 20 JAN 2016; Published online 18 FEB 2016. This work made use of GMT and SAC software. We appreciate comments in the manuscript by the Associate Editor, Rachel Abercrombie, Gavin Hayes, Kazuki Koketsu, and an anonymous reviewer that improved this presentation. The Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology data management center was used to access the seismic data from Global Seismic Network and Federation of Digital Seismic Network stations. This work was supported by U.S. National Science Foundation grant EAR1245717 (T.L.). Digital information about the moment rate functions and finite-fault slip models for all events can be found at https://sites.google.com/site/linglingye001/earthquakes/slip-models.

Attached Files

Published - Ye_et_al-2016-Journal_of_Geophysical_Research-_Solid_Earth.pdf

Supplemental Material - jgrb51446-sup-0001-Supplementary01.pdf

Supplemental Material - jgrb51446-sup-0001-Supplementary02.pdf

Supplemental Material - jgrb51446-sup-0001-Supplementary03.pdf

Files

jgrb51446-sup-0001-Supplementary02.pdf
Files (16.7 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:fb5d01f3a6d6bf649726150a1a83802c
2.7 MB Preview Download
md5:cf22a6d2fb18c04543cd0076c8fc5742
3.1 MB Preview Download
md5:4a2a7db9d6dcb34253ec9c8c203e9a61
2.9 MB Preview Download
md5:09841ecb6054fa7a9a6b8f5234884b36
8.1 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 22, 2023
Modified:
October 18, 2023