Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published June 15, 1981 | public
Journal Article

Repetitive Sequences of the Sea Urchin Genome II. Subfamily Structure and Evolutionary Conservation

Abstract

Members of three repetitive sequence families were isolated from recombinant λ-genome libraries, and were used to investigate sequence relationships within these families. Studies presented elsewhere show that members of all three repeat sequence families are transcribed tissue-specifically. The thermal stability of intrafamilial heteroduplexes was measured, and the extent of colinearity between related sequences was determined by restriction mapping, heteroduplex visualization, gel blot hybridization, and direct sequencing. One large and very divergent family, named 2108, was shown to consist of an assemblage of many small repeat sequence subfamilies. Each subfamily includes <40 members which are not contiguous in the genome but are very closely related colinear sequence elements several thousand nucleotides in length. The different 2108 subfamilies share only small sequence subelements, which in each subfamily occur in a different linear order and are surrounded by different sequences. A second divergent family consisting of short repetitive sequences, the 2109 family, includes many small internally homologous subfamilies as well. A third family, 2034, displays little internal sequence divergence and no apparent subfamily structure. The repeat sequence subfamilies may be biologically significant units of repetition. Thus specific 2108 subfamilies were shown to be evolutionary conserved to a remarkable degree. Highly homologous 2108 sequences were found shared among sea urchin species which diverged almost 200 million years ago, although only about 10% of the single copy DNA sequences of these species are now homologous enough to crossreact.

Additional Information

© 1981 Academic Press Inc. (London) Ltd. Received 13 October 1980. We thank Drs Norman Davidson and Tom Maniatis for their helpful reviews of the manuscript. This research was supported by National Institutes of Health grant GM-20927. Two of us (R.H.S. and J.W.P.) were supported by an NIH predoctoral training grant (GM-07616). Another author (D.M.A.) was supported by an NIH postdoctoral fellowship (HD-05510). One of us (L.B.M..) was supported by a California Institute of Technology Summer Undergraduate Research Fellowship, funded from the Prize Fund and Samuel Krown Donation.

Additional details

Created:
August 19, 2023
Modified:
October 18, 2023