Published September 2011
| public
Journal Article
Open
Comment on Ken Pomeranz's The Great Divergency
- Creators
-
Hoffman, Philip T.
Chicago
Abstract
With scores of readers in history, the social sciences, and the public at large, Ken Pomeranz's The Great Divergence has been an enormous and well-deserved success. Within history itself, its achievements are nothing short of miraculous, for it has overcome our discipline's obdurate balkanization ("I do early modern Europe—why should I care about Qing China?") and managed to bridge the gap between people who would rarely cross paths or even talk to one another: a world historian, for example, and an economic historian; or a scholar of ancient East Asia and a specialist on the British Industrial Revolution. And it has shaped the research agenda in a variety of history's subfields.
Additional Information
© 2011 The Historical SocietyFiles
Comment_on_Pomeranz.pdf
Files
(367.5 kB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:99c26e82402b60633d14e549f109288a
|
367.5 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
- Eprint ID
- 65447
- Resolver ID
- CaltechAUTHORS:20160317-134435714
- Created
-
2016-03-18Created from EPrint's datestamp field
- Updated
-
2021-11-10Created from EPrint's last_modified field