Published June 2007
| public
Journal Article
Political Reputations and Campaign Promises
Chicago
Abstract
We analyze conditions under which candidates' reputations may affect voters' beliefs over what policy will be implemented by the winning candidate of an election. We develop a model of repeated elections with complete information in which candidates are purely ideological. We analyze an equilibrium in which voters' strategies involve a credible threat to punish candidates who renege on their campaign promises and in which all campaign promises are believed by voters and honored by candidates. We characterize the maximal credible campaign promises and find that the degree to which promises are credible in equilibrium is an increasing function of the value of a candidate's reputation.
Additional Information
Copyright 2007 European Economic Association. Acknowledgments: Palfrey and Postlewaite acknowledge financial support from the National Science Foundation. Aragonès acknowledges financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology, grant SEC2003-01961, CREA-Barcelona Economics, and the hospitality of CBRSS at Harvard University. Palfrey thanks the Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica for its hospitality in Spring 2003. This paper is part of the PAC Project CIT-2-CT-2004-506084 funded by the European Commission. We thank Alberto Alesina, Abhijit Banerjee, Orit Kedar, Steve Matthews, and participants of the Workshop on Positive Political Economy at CBRSS (Harvard University). We also thank Roberto Perotti and three referees for helpful comments that improved this paper.Additional details
- Eprint ID
- 65040
- DOI
- 10.1162/JEEA.2007.5.4.846
- Resolver ID
- CaltechAUTHORS:20160303-150824425
- NSF
- Ministerio de Ciencia Y Tecnologia (MCyT)
- SEC2003-01961
- CREA-Barcelona Economics
- European Commission. PAC Project
- CIT-2-CT-2004-506084
- Created
-
2016-03-14Created from EPrint's datestamp field
- Updated
-
2021-11-10Created from EPrint's last_modified field