Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published October 21, 2015 | Accepted Version + Supplemental Material
Journal Article Open

Neural Encoding of Odors during Active Sampling and in Turbulent Plumes

Abstract

Sensory inputs are often fluctuating and intermittent, yet animals reliably utilize them to direct behavior. Here we ask how natural stimulus fluctuations influence the dynamic neural encoding of odors. Using the locust olfactory system, we isolated two main causes of odor intermittency: chaotic odor plumes and active sampling behaviors. Despite their irregularity, chaotic odor plumes still drove dynamic neural response features including the synchronization, temporal patterning, and short-term plasticity of spiking in projection neurons, enabling classifier-based stimulus identification and activating downstream decoders (Kenyon cells). Locusts can also impose odor intermittency through active sampling movements with their unrestrained antennae. Odors triggered immediate, spatially targeted antennal scanning that, paradoxically, weakened individual neural responses. However, these frequent but weaker responses were highly informative about stimulus location. Thus, not only are odor-elicited dynamic neural responses compatible with natural stimulus fluctuations and important for stimulus identification, but locusts actively increase intermittency, possibly to improve stimulus localization.

Additional Information

© 2015 Elsevier Inc. Received: December 3, 2014; Revised: May 11, 2015; Accepted: August 31, 2015; Published: October 8, 2015. This work was supported by the NIH and the Max Planck Society (G.L.), by grants from the U.S. Office of Naval Research (G.L. and S.C.), and by an intramural NIH-NICHD grant (M.S.). We thank Kristin Branson for advice on the automated antennal tracking and the Laurent Lab and Simon Laughlin for discussion and comments. Author Contributions: M.S., S.J.H., S.C., and G.L. conceived the experiments and wrote the manuscript. M.S. performed the odor plume experiments, and M.S. and Z.N.A. analyzed them. S.J.H. performed the active sampling behavior experiments. S.J.H. and S.C. performed the active sampling electrophysiology experiments, and S.J.H. analyzed the resulting data. G.L. managed and supervised the work.

Attached Files

Accepted Version - nihms722571.pdf

Supplemental Material - mmc1.pdf

Supplemental Material - mmc2.mp4

Files

mmc1.pdf
Files (4.3 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:46541921d1b8395c4c7c1c051f29d8dc
392.4 kB Preview Download
md5:595f09e4731ce35b245894551c569de2
3.0 MB Download
md5:0f675a028d231a4db573cad20a872dab
869.9 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 20, 2023
Modified:
October 25, 2023