Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published January 2015 | public
Journal Article

Mechanical failure modes of chronically implanted planar silicon-based neural probes for laminar recording

Abstract

Penetrating intracortical electrode arrays that record brain activity longitudinally are powerful tools for basic neuroscience research and emerging clinical applications. However, regardless of the technology used, signals recorded by these electrodes degrade over time. The failure mechanisms of these electrodes are understood to be a complex combination of the biological reactive tissue response and material failure of the device over time. While mechanical mismatch between the brain tissue and implanted neural electrodes have been studied as a source of chronic inflammation and performance degradation, the electrode failure caused by mechanical mismatch between different material properties and different structural components within a device have remained poorly characterized. Using Finite Element Model (FEM) we simulate the mechanical strain on a planar silicon electrode. The results presented here demonstrate that mechanical mismatch between iridium and silicon leads to concentrated strain along the border of the two materials. This strain is further focused on small protrusions such as the electrical traces in planar silicon electrodes. These findings are confirmed with chronic in vivo data (133–189 days) in mice by correlating a combination of single-unit electrophysiology, evoked multi-unit recordings, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy from traces and electrode sites with our modeling data. Several modes of mechanical failure of chronically implanted planar silicon electrodes are found that result in degradation and/or loss of recording. These findings highlight the importance of strains and material properties of various subcomponents within an electrode array.

Additional Information

© 2014 Elsevier Ltd. Received 27 August 2014; accepted 2 October 2014; available online 27 October 2014. The authors would like to thank Jeyakumar Subbaroyan and John Seymour for valuable discussion with FEM and NeuroNexus Electrodes, Cynthia A. Chestek for helpful discussions with primates, and Zhanhong 'Jeff' Du for assistance with chronic recordings. The authors would also like to thank Lance M. Bodily and Ellen M. Caparosa for assistance with surgery, Machiko Obayashi and Peter L. Strick for the use of a Cebus monkey anatomical (with support provided by NIHP30 NS076405 and R01 NS24328), and Hunter Meherns for the mouse anatomical data. Confocal microscopy and SEM were conducted at the University of Pittsburgh Center for Biological Imaging. This work was financially supported by an NIH R01 (5R01NS062019) and The Pittsburgh Foundation.

Additional details

Created:
August 22, 2023
Modified:
October 19, 2023