Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published August 1975 | public
Journal Article

Geological Criteria for Evaluating Seismicity

Abstract

This paper argues that the geologic record, and the late Quaternary history in particular, is a far more valuable tool in estimating seismicity and associated seismic hazard than has generally been appreciated. Those parts of the world with the longest historic records of earthquakes — some 2,000 yr for Japan and the Middle East and 3,000 yr for China — are the areas that should give us the greatest pause in using historic records for extrapolations, because earthquakes in these regions show surprisingly large long-term temporal and spatial variations. The very short historic record in North America should, therefore, be used with extreme caution in estimating possible future seismic activity. The geologic history of late Quaternary faulting is the most promising source of statistics on frequencies and locations of large shocks.

Additional Information

© 1975 Geological Society of America. Manuscript received by the Society February 12, 1975. Address as Retiring President of The Geological Society of America, Miami Beach, Florida, November 1974. In addition to those specifically cited in the text, I am deeply indebted to numerous groups and individuals in many parts of the world for assistance and participation in field studies. I particularly appreciate the assistance of various governmental organizations and educational institutions in Turkey, Greece, Bulgaria, Japan, Philippines, China, and Pakistan. Foreign travel was supported by UNESCO, National Science Foundation (U.S.-Japan Cooperative Science Program), National Academy of Sciences (Committee on Scholarly Communication with the People's Republic of China), Carnegie Institution of Washington (G. K. Gilbert Award), and the California Institute of Technology (John Barber Fund). I appreciate critical review of the manuscript by A. L. Albee, H. Kanamori, and R. P. Sharp.

Additional details

Created:
August 19, 2023
Modified:
October 19, 2023