Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published September 15, 1998 | Published
Journal Article Open

The adaptive nature of the human neurocognitive architecture: An alternative model

Abstract

The model of the human neurocognitive architecture proposed by evolutionary psychologists is based on the presumption that the demands of hunter-gatherer life generated a vast array of cognitive adaptations. Here we present an alternative model. We argue that the problems inherent in the biological markets of ancestral hominids and their mammalian predecessors would have required an adaptively flexible, on-line information-processing system, and would have driven the evolution of a functionally plastic neural substrate, the neocortex, rather than a confederation of evolutionarily prespecified social cognitive adaptations. In alignment with recent neuroscientific evidence, we suggest that human cognitive processes result from the activation of constructed cortical representational networks, which reflect probabilistic relationships between sensory inputs, behavioral responses, and adaptive outcomes. The developmental construction and experiential modification of these networks are mediated by subcortical circuitries that are responsive to the life history regulatory system. As a consequence, these networks are intrinsically adaptively constrained. The theoretical and research implications of this alternative evolutionary model are discussed.

Additional Information

© 1998 The National Academy of Sciences. Communicated by George C. Williams, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, July 9, 1998 (received for review March 18, 1998). We thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful observations. For incisive comments on earlier drafts, we thank John Allman, Linda Blitz, Leslie Brothers, Patricia Churchland, Nancy Etcoff, Tal Garfinkel, Roger Masters, Michael McGuire, V. S. Ramachandran, Terrence Sejnowski, and Donald Symons. We thank Terrence Sejnowski for additional discussions. R.B. also thanks Florence Bingham, Chuck, Ronnie and Muni Blitz, and Jeremy Sherman for their contributions. P.L.C. sincerely thanks Bruce Anderson, Cassie Bennett, Valerie Bennett, Jaden Bennett-Andrade, Linda Blitz, Behzad Boroumand, Deborah Brown, Deanna Clear, Riki Dennis, Lisa Farwell, Viola Hall, John Hench, the La Cerras, Vince Pisani, Roberto Refinetti, Gail Shannon, and especially Tom Stefl for invaluable support. R.B. gratefully acknowledges the L. K. Whittier Foundation, which provided support for a book project that required radical revision as a consequence of the scientific shift in understanding presented in this paper. P.L.C. also thanks the McDonnell Foundation for a fellowship to the Cognitive Neuroscience Summer Institute on neural plasticity and evolutionary psychology. The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked ''advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Attached Files

Published - PNAS-1998-Cerra-11290-4.pdf

Files

PNAS-1998-Cerra-11290-4.pdf
Files (110.8 kB)
Name Size Download all
md5:1788970d3b1dbfb45017423864ee8f72
110.8 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 19, 2023
Modified:
October 18, 2023