Published July 15, 2008
| Published
Journal Article
Open
Reply to Hupé et al.: The predictive correlation of pupil dilation and relative dominance durations in rivalry is not a statistical artifact
Chicago
Abstract
We are encouraged by Hupé et al.'s (1) independent replication of our findings (2) and the fact that our data per se stands uncontested. Hupé et al. argue against our interpretation of these results, based on removal of short dominance durations from the analysis. Although it is no surprise that selective removal of data points can reduce the significance of any correlation, we appreciate the theoretic basis of their concern: Because pupil dilation persists for 1–2 s, short preswitch dominance durations may be disproportionately affected by the pupil dilation accompanying the previous switch event (figure 1F in ref. 2).
Additional Information
© 2008 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA. Published ahead of print July 2, 2008. Author contributions: W.E., J.S., C.K., and O.C. wrote the paper. The authors declare no conflict of interest.Attached Files
Published - PNAS-2008-Einhäuser-E44.pdf
Files
PNAS-2008-Einhäuser-E44.pdf
Files
(68.8 kB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:82901bcc4a39c4ee08521f20ed693990
|
68.8 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
- Eprint ID
- 52036
- Resolver ID
- CaltechAUTHORS:20141121-094359772
- Created
-
2014-11-21Created from EPrint's datestamp field
- Updated
-
2021-11-10Created from EPrint's last_modified field