Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published May 2, 2003 | Supplemental Material
Journal Article Open

Chimeric nucleases stimulate gene targeting in human cells

Abstract

Correction of gene defects in human somatic cells by targeting as has been used in murine embryonic stem cells (1, 2) has been precluded by the low spontaneous rate of gene targeting (3). However, creation of a DNA double-stranded break (DSB) in the genomic target (DSB-GT) can stimulate homologous recombination by over 1000-fold (4). We can rapidly and quantitatively measure gene targeting by correcting a mutation in a green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene that has been stably integrated into the genome (5) (fig. S1). With an optimized GFP gene targeting system, the introduction of a DSB by I–Sce I (Sce) stimulated GT >40,000-fold and the absolute rate of gene targeting reached 3 to 5% (fig. S2). Such a system, however, depends on the prior introduction of a Sce binding site into the target gene and cannot be used for endogenous genes. Chimeric nucleases (CNs) have the potential to create sequence-specific DSBs (6). CNs—fusions between zinc finger binding DNA binding domains and the endonuclease domain of Fok I—can sitespecifically cleave naked DNA in vitro (6), extrachromosomal DNA in Xenopus oocytes (7), and chromosomal DNA in Drosophila (8). CNs work as dimers, and their efficiency depends on the spacing and orientation of the zinc finger binding sites with respect to the length of the amino acid linker between the DNA binding and endonuclease domains (7, 9). QQR is an artificial zinc finger DNA binding domain that recognizes the sequence 5′-GGGGAAGAA-3′ with nanomolar affinity (10). We modified QQR chimeric nucleases (QQR-CNs) (7, 9) (Fig. 1A) and tested whether they stimulated gene targeting (Fig. 1B). The background rate of gene targeting was 0.71 events per million transfected cells (fig. S1C). QQRL18-CN stimulated gene targeting 17-fold on target QQR6 and 260-fold on target QQR8 (Fig. 1B). QQRL0-CN did not stimulate gene targeting on target QQR8, but it was as efficient as Sce in stimulating gene targeting by over 2000-fold on target QQR6 (Fig. 1B). QQRL18-CN showed some preference for an 8–base pair (bp) spacing between binding sites whereas QQRL0-CN preferred 6-bp spacing. Thus, removing the linker between the zinc spacfinger and the nuclease domains increased the activity and specificity of the fusion protein in mammalian cells. As controls, we showed that the CNs did not stimulate gene targeting if (i) they lacked a nuclear localization signal, (ii) there was a single binding site rather than an inverted repeat binding site in the target, and (iii) the cognate binding site was changed. Thus, homodimers of CNs are potent stimulators of gene targeting in human somatic cells.

Additional Information

© 2003 American Association for the Advancement of Science. We thank J. Pomerantz and S Cameron for their helpful comments on the manuscript, and E. Denneyfor excellent technical support. We thank C. Pabo and K. Joung for providing plasmid pUV5-GP-Z123, D. Carroll for providing pET15b:QQR1(L0), S Chandrasegaran for providing pET15b:QQR1(L18), and M. Jasin for providing PGK-Sce. M.H.P. was supported by the Physician's Postdoctoral Fellowship from the HHMI and the Career Development Award from the Burroughs-Wellcome Fund. Supported by NIH grant RO1-GM39458 (to D.B.).

Attached Files

Supplemental Material - Porteus.SOM.pdf

Files

Porteus.SOM.pdf
Files (359.4 kB)
Name Size Download all
md5:d0c0bc2f3d7dbbefc69232477b7454d1
359.4 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 19, 2023
Modified:
October 18, 2023