Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published October 2012 | public
Journal Article

Electron Capture Dissociation of Hydrogen- Deficient Peptide Radical Cations

Abstract

Hydrogen-deficient peptide radical cations exhibit fascinating gas phase chemistry, which is governed by radical driven dissociation and, in many cases, by a combination of radical and charge driven fragmentation. Here we examine electron capture dissociation (ECD) of doubly, [M + H]^(2+•), and triply, [M + 2H]^(3+•), charged hydrogen-deficient species, aiming to investigate the effect of a hydrogen-deficient radical site on the ECD outcome and characterize the dissociation pathways of hydrogen-deficient species in ECD. ECD of [M + H]^(2+•) and [M + 2H]^(3+•) precursor ions resulted in efficient electron capture by the hydrogen-deficient species. However, the intensities of c- and z-type product ions were reduced, compared with those observed for the even electron species, indicating suppression of N–Cα backbone bond cleavages. We postulate that radical recombination occurs after the initial electron capture event leading to a stable even electron intermediate, which does not trigger N–Cα bond dissociations. Although the intensities of c- and z-type product ions were reduced, the number of backbone bond cleavages remained largely unaffected between the ECD spectra of the even electron and hydrogen-deficient species. We hypothesize that a small ion population exist as a biradical, which can trigger N–C_α bond cleavages. Alternatively, radical recombination and N–C_α bond cleavages can be in competition, with radical recombination being the dominant pathway and N–C_α cleavages occurring to a lesser degree. Formation of b- and y-type ions observed for two of the hydrogendeficient peptides examined is also discussed.

Additional Information

© 2012 American Society for Mass Spectrometry. Received: 11 April 2012; Revised: 5 June 2012; Accepted: 12 June 2012; Published online: 2 August 2012. The authors acknowledge support for this work by the Beckman Institute and the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation.

Additional details

Created:
August 22, 2023
Modified:
October 20, 2023