Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published August 17, 2012 | Published + Supplemental Material
Journal Article Open

How We Choose One over Another: Predicting Trial-by-Trial Preference Decision

Abstract

Preference formation is a complex problem as it is subjective, involves emotion, is led by implicit processes, and changes depending on the context even within the same individual. Thus, scientific attempts to predict preference are challenging, yet quite important for basic understanding of human decision making mechanisms, but prediction in a group-average sense has only a limited significance. In this study, we predicted preferential decisions on a trial by trial basis based on brain responses occurring before the individuals made their decisions explicit. Participants made a binary preference decision of approachability based on faces while their electrophysiological responses were recorded. An artificial neural network based pattern-classifier was used with time-frequency resolved patterns of a functional connectivity measure as features for the classifier. We were able to predict preference decisions with a mean accuracy of 74.3±2.79% at participant-independent level and of 91.4±3.8% at participant-dependent level. Further, we revealed a causal role of the first impression on final decision and demonstrated the temporal trajectory of preference decision formation.

Additional Information

© 2012 Bhushan et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Received February 2, 2011; Accepted July 23, 2012; Published August 17, 2012. Editor: Sam Gilbert, University College London, United Kingdom. Funding: The research has been partially supported by JST.ERATO (SS, JB) and DST, Government of India (JB, GS). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. We thank Rhiannon Jones for data collection. We also thank Dr. Sam Gilbert for raising the issue of motor responses. SS is supported by JST.CREST and MEXT.gCOE. Author Contributions: Conceived and designed the experiments: JB SS. Performed the experiments: JB JL. Analyzed the data: VB GS JL. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JB. Wrote the paper: JB VB. Supervised all aspects of the study: JB.

Attached Files

Published - journal.pone.0043351.pdf

Supplemental Material - FigS1.tif

Supplemental Material - FigS2.tif

Supplemental Material - FigS3.tif

Supplemental Material - MethodsS1.doc

Supplemental Material - TableS1.doc

Supplemental Material - TableS2.doc

Files

FigS1.tif
Files (2.6 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:11db03ba3827af6ad480859b55eb4f74
393.7 kB Preview Download
md5:42636662e6e404f2b30f0f78f99cb1e4
784.4 kB Preview Download
md5:a10e06961a0274e95fe3f45cd88e36ff
411.1 kB Preview Download
md5:130e8b43d850862180a9bb284afc58ce
38.4 kB Download
md5:47aaedd19a7a873099bf201b18a43edd
52.7 kB Download
md5:263724d7c884f668f7b0954a7402e1c5
38.9 kB Download
md5:d5fd5aacd22f0b5ee1c19499e75675b2
838.0 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
September 14, 2023
Modified:
October 23, 2023