Parallelism and Time in Hierarchical Self-Assembly
- Creators
- Chen, Ho-Lin
-
Doty, David
Abstract
We study the role that parallelism plays in time complexity of variants of Winfree's abstract Tile Assembly Model (aTAM), a model of molecular algorithmic self-assembly. In the "hierarchical" aTAM, two assemblies, both consisting of multiple tiles, are allowed to aggregate together, whereas in the "seeded" aTAM, tiles attach one at a time to a growing assembly. Adleman, Cheng, Goel, and Huang (Running Time and Program Size for Self-Assembled Squares, STOC 2001) showed how to assemble an n x n square in O(n) time in the seeded aTAM using O(log n/log log n) unique tile types, where both of these parameters are optimal. They asked whether the hierarchical aTAM could allow a tile system to use the ability to form large assemblies in parallel before they attach to break the Ω(n) lower bound for assembly time. We show that there is a tile system with the optimal O(log n/log log n) tile types that assembles an n x n square using O(log^2 n) parallel "stages", which is close to the optimal Ω(log n) stages, forming the final n x n square from four n/2 x n/2 squares, which are themselves recursively formed from n/4 x n/4 squares, etc. However, despite this nearly maximal parallelism, the system requires superlinear time to assemble the square. We extend the definition of partial order tile systems studied by Adleman et al. in a natural way to hierarchical assembly and show that no hierarchical partial order tile system can build any shape with diameter N in less than time Ω(N), demonstrating that in this case the hierarchical model affords no speedup whatsoever over the seeded model. We also strengthen the Ω(N) time lower bound for deterministic seeded systems of Adleman et al. to nondeterministic seeded systems. Finally, we show that for infinitely many n, a tile system can assemble an n x n' rectangle, with n > n', in time O(n^(4/5) log n), breaking the linear-time lower bound that applies to all seeded systems and partial order hierarchical systems.
Additional Information
© 2012 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. The first author was supported by the Molecular Programming Project under NSF grant 0832824, the second author was supported by a Computing Innovation Fellowship under NSF grant 1019343. The authors are especially grateful to David Soloveichik for contributions to this paper, including the proof of Theorem 4.1, discussion and insights on other proofs, and generally for indispensable help with discovering and solidifying the results. The authors also thank Adam Marblestone, Robbie Schweller, Matt Patitz, and the members of Erik Winfree's group, particularly Joe Schaeer, Erik Winfree, Damien Woods, and Seung Woo Shin, for insightful discussion and comments, and to Bernie Yurke and Rizal Hariadi for discussing diusion rates and pointing the authors to [9, 35]. We are grateful to anonymous reviewers for identifying important flaws in the original proofs of some theorems.Attached Files
Published - p1163-chen.pdf
Files
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:752b86d9b56861cfede39e61e825fb57
|
986.9 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
- Eprint ID
- 31630
- Resolver ID
- CaltechAUTHORS:20120524-103212168
- NSF
- CCF-0832824
- NSF
- 1019394
- Created
-
2012-05-24Created from EPrint's datestamp field
- Updated
-
2021-11-09Created from EPrint's last_modified field