Published June 2001
| public
Book Section - Chapter
Time Division is Better Than Frequency Division for Periodic Internet Broadcast of Dynamic Data
- Creators
- Foltz, Kevin
-
Bruck, Jehoshua
Chicago
Abstract
We consider two ways to send items over a broadcast channel and compare them using the metric of expected waiting time. The first is frequency division, where each item is broadcast on its own subchannel of lower bandwidth. We find the optimal allocation of bandwidth to the subchannels for this method. Then we look at time division, where items are sent sequentially on a single full-bandwidth channel. We show that for any frequency division broadcast schedule, we can find a better time division schedule. Thus time division is better than frequency division.
Additional Information
© 2001 IEEE. Date of Current Version: 07 August 2002. This research was partially supported by the Lee Center for Advanced Networking at Caltech.Additional details
- Eprint ID
- 27823
- Resolver ID
- CaltechAUTHORS:20111117-083940997
- Caltech Lee Center for Advanced Networking
- Created
-
2011-11-17Created from EPrint's datestamp field
- Updated
-
2021-11-09Created from EPrint's last_modified field
- Other Numbering System Name
- INSPEC Accession Number
- Other Numbering System Identifier
- 7086684