Published June 1990
| Published
Journal Article
Open
Comment on Noll and Krier, "Some Implications of Cognitive Psychology for Risk Regulation"
- Creators
-
Camerer, Colin F.
Chicago
Abstract
We have known about systematic violations of the expected utility (EU) theory of choice for almost forty years, since Maurice Allais got Jimmie Savage to violate his own "sure-thing principle" (or "independence axiom") while making hypothetical choices over lunch in Paris. Savage was victimized by some combination of wine and intuition. The wine's effect is gone, but the intuition is not: devotion to EU sometimes produces unappealing choices.
Additional Information
© 1990 The University of Chicago.Attached Files
Published - 1210D4A3d01.pdf
Files
1210D4A3d01.pdf
Files
(967.7 kB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:36063b9abf96e5bdfceca42c2e0a2747
|
967.7 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
- Eprint ID
- 22442
- Resolver ID
- CaltechAUTHORS:20110223-085614920
- Created
-
2011-03-08Created from EPrint's datestamp field
- Updated
-
2019-10-03Created from EPrint's last_modified field