Experimental Study of Law
- Creators
-
Camerer, Colin F.
- Talley, Eric
- Others:
- Polinsky, A. Mitchell
- Shavell, Steven
Abstract
This chapter surveys literature on experimental law and economics. Long the domain of legally minded psychologists and criminologists, experimental methods are gaining significant popularity among economists interested in exploring positive and normative aspects of law. Because this literature is relatively new among legally-minded economists, we spend some time in this survey on methodological points. with particular attention to the role of experiments within theoretical and empirical scholarship, the core ingredients of a well done experiment, and common distinctions between experimental economics and other fields that use experimental methods. We then consider a number of areas where experimental evidence is increasingly playing a role in testing the underlying foundational precepts of economic behavior as it applies to law, including bargaining in the shadow of the law, the selection of suits for litigation, and the investigation of jury and judge behavior. Our survey concludes by offering some suggestions about what directions experimental economists might push the methodology in the study of legal rules.
Additional Information
© 2007 Elsevier B.V. First Version: February 2004. Available online 6 November 2007. Many thanks to Jennifer Arlen, Mitch Polinsky, Steve Shavell, and participants at a conference at Harvard Law School for helpful comments and discussions. Jennifer Lam provided excellent research assistance. All errors are ours.Attached Files
Draft - HLEDec282004.doc
Files
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:40472966af05e73fb51d9b726f3c3247
|
115.7 kB | Download |
Additional details
- Eprint ID
- 22004
- DOI
- 10.1016/S1574-0730(07)02021-X
- Resolver ID
- CaltechAUTHORS:20110204-084343506
- Created
-
2011-02-08Created from EPrint's datestamp field
- Updated
-
2021-11-09Created from EPrint's last_modified field