Using Neural Measures of Economic Value to Solve the Public Goods Free-Rider Problem
Abstract
Every social group needs to decide when to provide public goods and how to allocate the costs among its members. Ideally, this decision would maximize the group's net benefits while also ensuring that every individual's benefit is greater than the cost he or she has to pay. Unfortunately, the economic theory of mechanism design has shown that this ideal solution is not feasible when the group leadership does not know the values of the individual group members for the public good. We show that this impossibility result can be overcome in laboratory settings by combining technologies for obtaining neural measures of value (functional magnetic resonance imaging–based pattern classification) with carefully designed institutions that allocate costs based on both reported and neurally measured values.
Additional Information
© 2009 American Association for the Advancement of Science. 4 June 2009; accepted 25 August 2009; published online 10 September 2009. Supporting Online Material: www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/1177302/DC1 - Materials and Methods; Figs. S1 to S15; Tables S1 to S3; References. Financial support from NSF–Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship Program (I.K.), Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (C.F.C., A.R.), and Human Frontier Science Program (C.F.C.) is gratefully acknowledged.Additional details
- Eprint ID
- 16602
- Resolver ID
- CaltechAUTHORS:20091106-113059865
- NSF
- Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
- Human Frontier Science Program
- Created
-
2009-11-13Created from EPrint's datestamp field
- Updated
-
2021-11-08Created from EPrint's last_modified field