Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published September 16, 2009 | Published
Journal Article Open

Three-dimensional boundary integral modeling of spontaneous earthquake sequences and aseismic slip

Abstract

Fault processes involve complex patterns of seismic events and aseismic slip. This work develops a three-dimensional (3-D) methodology for simulating long-term history of spontaneous seismic and aseismic slip on a vertical planar strike-slip fault subjected to slow tectonic loading. Our approach reproduces all stages of earthquake cycles, from accelerating slip before dynamic instability, to rapid dynamic propagation of earthquake rupture, to postseismic slip, and to interseismic creep, including aseismic transients. We use the developed 3-D methodology to study interaction of fault slip with a small patch of higher normal stress over long-term slip history. For uniform initial prestress, dynamic rupture is significantly affected by the stronger patch in the first simulated event but not in subsequent ones. The change in behavior is due to redistribution of shear stress by prior slip, which demonstrates that distributions of fault strength and stress are related and illustrates the importance of simulating long slip histories even in studies of dynamic rupture. Despite no long-term effect on dynamic rupture, the small patch of higher normal stress influences nucleation processes and hence long-term slip patterns in the model. Comparison of the fully dynamic simulations and a widely used quasi-dynamic approach shows that the quasi-dynamic approach modifies long-term slip patterns in addition to resulting in much smaller slip velocities and rupture speeds during dynamic events. We show that the response of quasi-dynamic formulations with reduced radiation damping terms can be scaled to match the results of the standard quasi-dynamic formulation and hence cannot improve the comparison.

Additional Information

©2009 American Geophysical Union. Received 17 July 2008; accepted 21 May 2009; published 16 September 2009. This study was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant EAR 0548277), the U.S. Geological Survey (grant 07HQGR0070), and the Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC). SCEC is funded by NSF Cooperative Agreement EAR-0106924 and USGS Cooperative Agreement 02HQAG0008. This is SCEC contribution 1254. The numerical simulations for this research were performed on Caltech Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences Dell cluster. We thank Yoshi Kaneko for discussions.

Attached Files

Published - Lapusta2009p6032J_Geophys_Res-Sol_Ea.pdf

Files

Lapusta2009p6032J_Geophys_Res-Sol_Ea.pdf
Files (1.8 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:33f41712bb85cd1858cedefe6341c83d
1.8 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 22, 2023
Modified:
October 19, 2023