A comparison of visual and haltere-mediated feedback in the control of body saccades in Drosophila melanogaster
- Creators
- Bender, John A.
-
Dickinson, Michael H.
Abstract
The flight trajectories of fruit flies consist of straight flight segments interspersed with rapid turns called body saccades. Although the saccades are stereotyped, it is not known whether their brief time course is due to a feed-forward (predetermined) motor program or due to feedback from sensory systems that are reflexively activated by the rapid rotation. Two sensory modalities, the visual system and the mechanosensory halteres, are likely sources of such feedback because they are sensitive to angular velocities within the range experienced during saccades. Utilizing a magnetic tether in which flies are fixed in space but free to rotate about their yaw axis, we systematically manipulated the feedback from the visual and haltere systems to test their role in determining the time course of body saccades. We found that altering visual feedback had no significant effect on the dynamics of saccades, whereas increasing and decreasing the amount of haltere-mediated feedback decreased and increased saccade amplitude, respectively. In other experiments, we altered the aerodynamic surface of the wings such that the flies had to actively modify their wing-stroke kinematics to maintain straight flight on the magnetic tether. Flies exhibit such modification, but the control is compromised in the dark, indicating that the visual system does provide feedback for flight stability at lower angular velocities, to which the haltere system is less sensitive. Cutting the wing surface disrupted the time course of the saccades, indicating that although flies employ sensory feedback to modulate saccade dynamics, it is not precise or fast enough to compensate for large changes in wing efficacy.
Additional Information
© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2006. Accepted 4 October 2006. First published online November 17, 2006. The authors gratefully acknowledge G. Card for assistance collecting high-speed video and Dr D. Altshuler for aid with statistical analysis. M. Reiser and Dr A. Straw also contributed to the development of the stimulating and recording systems. Prof. R. Wyman at Yale University graciously provided us with shaking-B2 mutant flies for this study. This work was supported by award N00014-01-1-0676 from the Office of Naval Research, by the Institute for Collaborative Biotechnologies through grant DAAD19-03-D-0004 from the US Army Research Office, and by the Packard Foundation.Attached Files
Published - BENjeb06b.pdf
Files
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:790e5c7c0b1bef8391ec7943a47cf9c1
|
2.4 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
- Eprint ID
- 15899
- Resolver ID
- CaltechAUTHORS:20090917-090924650
- Office of Naval Research (ONR)
- N00014-01-1-0676
- Army Research Office (ARO)
- DAAD19-03-D-0004
- David and Lucile Packard Foundation
- Created
-
2009-09-23Created from EPrint's datestamp field
- Updated
-
2021-11-08Created from EPrint's last_modified field