Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published June 7, 2009 | public
Journal Article

Comparison of high-accuracy numerical simulations of black-hole binaries with stationary-phase post-Newtonian template waveforms for initial and advanced LIGO

Abstract

We study the effectiveness of stationary-phase approximated post-Newtonian waveforms currently used by ground-based gravitational-wave detectors to search for the coalescence of binary black holes by comparing them to an accurate waveform obtained from numerical simulation of an equal-mass non-spinning binary black hole inspiral, merger and ringdown. We perform this study for the initial- and advanced-LIGO detectors. We find that overlaps between the templates and signal can be improved by integrating the match filter to higher frequencies than used currently. We propose simple analytic frequency cutoffs for both initial and advanced LIGO, which achieve nearly optimal matches, and can easily be extended to unequal-mass, spinning systems. We also find that templates that include terms in the phase evolution up to 3.5 post-Newtonian (pN) order are nearly always better, and rarely significantly worse, than 2.0 pN templates currently in use. For initial LIGO we recommend a strategy using templates that include a recently introduced pseudo-4.0 pN term in the low-mass (M ≤ 35 M☉) region, and 3.5 pN templates allowing unphysical values of the symmetric reduced mass η above this. This strategy always achieves overlaps within 0.3% of the optimum, for the data used here. For advanced LIGO we recommend a strategy using 3.5 pN templates up to M = 12 M☉, 2.0 pN templates up to M = 21 M☉, pseudo-4.0 pN templates up to 65 M☉, and 3.5 pN templates with unphysical η for higher masses. This strategy always achieves overlaps within 0.7% of the optimum for advanced LIGO.

Additional Information

© 2009 IOP Publishing Limited. Print publication: Issue 11 (7 June 2009); received 12 January 2009; in final form 20 April 2009; published 19 May 2009. We thank Luisa Buchman, Yanbei Chen, Curt Cutler, Lisa Goggin, Larry Kidder, Luis Lehner, Lee Lindblom, Harald Pfeiffer, Mark Scheel, Kip Thorne and Alan Weinstein for useful discussions. This work was supported in part by grants from the Sherman Fairchild Foundation and by NSF grants PHY-0601459, PHY-0652995 and DMS-0553302 to Caltech. PACS numbers: 04.25.D−, 04.25.dg, 04.25.Nx, 04.30.Db, 04.80.Nn

Additional details

Created:
August 20, 2023
Modified:
October 18, 2023