Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published March 15, 2009 | Supplemental Material + Accepted Version
Journal Article Open

Wnt and EGF pathways act together to induce C. elegans male hook development

Abstract

Comparative studies of vulva development between Caenorhabditis elegans and other nematode species have provided some insight into the evolution of patterning networks. However, molecular genetic details are available only in C. elegans and Pristionchus pacificus. To extend our knowledge on the evolution of patterning networks, we studied the C. elegans male hook competence group (HCG), an equivalence group that has similar developmental origins to the vulval precursor cells (VPCs), which generate the vulva in the hermaphrodite. Similar to VPC fate specification, each HCG cell adopts one of three fates (1°, 2°, 3°), and 2° HCG fate specification is mediated by LIN-12/Notch. We show that 2° HCG specification depends on the presence of a cell with the 1° fate. We also provide evidence that Wnt signaling via the Frizzled-like Wnt receptor LIN-17 acts to specify the 1° and 2° HCG fate. A requirement for EGF signaling during 1° fate specification is seen only when LIN-17 activity is compromised. In addition, activation of the EGF pathway decreases dependence on LIN-17 and causes ectopic hook development. Our results suggest that WNT plays a more significant role than EGF signaling in specifying HCG fates, whereas in VPC specification EGF signaling is the major inductive signal. Nonetheless, the overall logic is similar in the VPCs and the HCG: EGF and/or WNT induce a 1° lineage, and LIN-12/NOTCH induces a 2° lineage. Wnt signaling is also required for execution of the 1° and 2° HCG lineages. lin-17 and bar-1/β-catenin are preferentially expressed in the presumptive 1° cell P11.p. The dynamic subcellular localization of BAR-1–GFP in P11.p is concordant with the timing of HCG fate determination.

Additional Information

© 2009 Elsevier. Received 16 July 2008; revised 26 November 2008; accepted 19 December 2008. Available online 30 December 2008. We thank Jennifer Green for the HS::CAM-1 strain, Bhagwati Gupta for the lin-17::GFP construct, David Eisenmann for the BAR-1– GFP strain, Helen Chamberlin for unpublished data the Caenorhabditis Genetic Center for providing some strains used in this study, Raymond Lee for suggesting eat-4::GFP as a neuronal marker and Takao Inoue for the cwn-1::GFP and cwn-2::GFP reporters. We thank Mihoko Kato, Cheryl Van Buskirk, Jennifer Green, Takao Inoue, Weiwei Zhong, Jolene Fernandes, Iva Greenwald, William Fixsen, Victor Ambros and Elissa Hallem for helpful discussions and critical reading of this manuscript. P.W.S. and H.R.H. are Investigators of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. H.R.H. was supported by NIH grant GM24663. A.S. was supported by a HHMI Pre-Doctoral Fellowship. While at MIT, M.A.H., P.W.S. and E.L.F. were supported by USPHS training grant GM07287. Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.12.023.

Attached Files

Accepted Version - nihms102170.pdf

Supplemental Material - Yu2009p1028Dev_Biol_supp.doc

Files

nihms102170.pdf
Files (9.9 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:832517852e8f65f6e33cfec68574543d
9.3 MB Preview Download
md5:2720299c1a0182eff3d89c7ccea921b4
600.6 kB Download

Additional details

Created:
August 21, 2023
Modified:
October 18, 2023