Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published November 2008 | Supplemental Material + Accepted Version
Journal Article Open

Rapid microwave-assisted CNBr cleavage of bead-bound peptides

Abstract

Large libraries of peptides, cyclic peptides, and other molecules are standard tools for the discovery of drugs, molecular probes, and affinity reagents. In particular, one-bead-one-compound (OBOC) libraries,(1) prepared by the split-and-mix method,(2) provide access to a broad chemical space with a minimum of reagents. Once such a library has been screened against the target of interest, the chemical identity of the library elements on the hit beads is identified. For peptide libraries and their variants, mass spectrometry (MS) based peptide sequencing provides the most rapid method for such analysis. OBOC libraries are constructed in a number of ways to facilitate MS analysis,(3-5) but one common feature is that the peptide must be cleaved from the bead prior to being introduced into the mass spectrometer. While a number of chemical(6) and photochemical(7) cleavage strategies have been developed, the most common strategy is to incorporate a CNBr-cleavable methionine-linker group at the C-terminus of the peptide.(8) CNBr cleavage has also been widely used in proteomics to cleave proteins.(9) With such chemistry, up to 100 beads from an OBOC peptide library can be sequenced in a 24 h period.(10) A large fraction of that time, however, is devoted to the CNBr cleavage step. Standard literature protocols describe CNBr cleavage as requiring between 12 and 24 h, using 20−30 μL of 0.25 M CNBr in 70% aqueous formic acid at room temperature.(11) Although the CNBr cleavage time may be reduced to 2−4 h at elevated temperatures (47 °C), significant side-products may be generated.(12) All reports that we have found that describe CNBr cleavage chemistry from single beads have used the same conditions as for proteomics, although the two chemical processes are not necessarily equivalent.

Additional Information

© 2008 American Chemical Society. Received July 4, 2008. Publication Date (Web): September 24, 2008. We acknowledge Heather Agnew and Rosemary Rohde for the assistance provided with obtaining Edman degradation peptide sequencing results. This work was supported by the Institute of Bioengineering and Nanotechnology (Biomedical Research Council, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore), with additional support (J.R.H.) from the National Cancer Institute Grant No. 5U54 CA119347 (J.R.H., P.I.) and a subcontract from the Mitre Corporation.

Attached Files

Accepted Version - nihms91093.pdf

Supplemental Material - LEEjcc08supp.pdf

Files

LEEjcc08supp.pdf
Files (2.5 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:974680a7610a623a95587ad7bef29098
1.7 MB Preview Download
md5:a061526670b674257cd9998219c78ed5
798.7 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 22, 2023
Modified:
October 18, 2023