Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published January 6, 2009 | Published + Supplemental Material
Journal Article Open

Nonlinear threshold behavior during the loss of Arctic sea ice

Abstract

In light of the rapid recent retreat of Arctic sea ice, a number of studies have discussed the possibility of a critical threshold (or "tipping point") beyond which the ice–albedo feedback causes the ice cover to melt away in an irreversible process. The focus has typically been centered on the annual minimum (September) ice cover, which is often seen as particularly susceptible to destabilization by the ice–albedo feedback. Here, we examine the central physical processes associated with the transition from ice-covered to ice-free Arctic Ocean conditions. We show that although the ice–albedo feedback promotes the existence of multiple ice-cover states, the stabilizing thermodynamic effects of sea ice mitigate this when the Arctic Ocean is ice covered during a sufficiently large fraction of the year. These results suggest that critical threshold behavior is unlikely during the approach from current perennial sea-ice conditions to seasonally ice-free conditions. In a further warmed climate, however, we find that a critical threshold associated with the sudden loss of the remaining wintertime-only sea ice cover may be likely.

Additional Information

© 2009 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA. Edited by Carl Wunsch, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, and approved November 14, 2008 (received for review July 25, 2008). Published online before print December 24, 2008, doi:10.1073/pnas.0806887106 We thank the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics summer program at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) [National Science Foundation (NSF) Grant OCE0325296], where the development of the physical representations used in this study benefited from discussions with many visitors and staff including Norbert Untersteiner, John Walsh, Jamie Morison, Dick Moritz, Danny Feltham, Göran Björk, Bert Rudels, Doug Martinson, Andrew Fowler, George Veronis, Grae Worster, Neil Balmforth, Ed Spiegel, Joe Keller, and Alan Thorndike. I.E. thanks Eli Tziperman and Cecilia Bitz for helpful conversations during the course of this work. The authors thank Richard Goody, Tapio Schneider, and Eli Tziperman for comments on the manuscript. J.S.W. acknowledges support from NSF Grant OPP0440841 and Yale University, and the Wenner–Gren Foundation, the Royal Institute of Technology, and NORDITA in Stockholm. I.E. acknowledges support from a National Aeronautics and Space Administration Earth and Space Science Fellowship, a WHOI Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Fellowship, NSF Paleoclimate Program Grant ATM-0502482, the McDonnell Foundation, a prize postdoctoral fellowship through the California Institute of Technology Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, and a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Climate and Global Change Postdoctoral Fellowship administered by the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. Author contributions: I.E. and J.S.W. designed research, performed research, and wrote the paper. The authors declare no conflict of interest. This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0806887106/DCSupplemental.

Attached Files

Published - EISpnas09.pdf

Supplemental Material - EISpnas09supp.pdf

Files

EISpnas09.pdf
Files (856.5 kB)
Name Size Download all
md5:8eb04ea43a917439928c404ee40082f2
296.2 kB Preview Download
md5:15fd9b6e94df4670a51460ecfe85c44c
560.3 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 22, 2023
Modified:
October 17, 2023