Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published August 1961 | Published
Journal Article Open

On the Species Specificity of Acceptor RNA and Attachment Enzymes

Abstract

One of the steps in protein biosynthesis appears to be the attachment of each amino acid to a specific acceptor (SRNA) molecule. According to the adaptor hypothesis, each SRNA molecule would then fit to a specific complementary base sequence on a linear RNA template, specifying the sequence of amino acids in the resultant protein [1,2]. An adaptor molecule thus could have two specificities: one recognizing the correct amino acid and activating enzyme; the other, the proper position on the template. The correctness of the amino-acid sequence therefore would depend upon the precision and constancy of the adaptors. However, the structures of the enzymes and adaptors are presumably under the genetic control of the organism and might be subject to heritable modifications. It is therefore conceivable that one or both ends of an adaptor might change sufficiently to cause occasional errors and, in the long run, an alteration of the genetic code might evolve. This notion, prompted by genetic observations [3] which suggested that mutation of a bacterium might modify its translation of genetic information, lead to the present comparison of the specificities of the acceptor RNA and activating enzymes of different organisms. Several differences in specificity have been reported previously. Berg et al. [4] demonstrated that SRNA from Escherichia coli contains two distinguishable acceptors for methionine. An enzyme prepared from yeast could attach methionine to one of these, while the enzyme from E. coli could attach to both. Webster found, in pig liver, a difference between the nuclear and cytoplasmic attachment enzymes for alanine. Rendi and Ochoa [6] noted that, for leucine, the enzymes in yeast and in E. coli could attach only to their homologous SRNA. Furthermore, in the case of leucine, rat liver enzyme and SRNA were interchangeable with those from E. coli. The observations presented below show that whether the enzymes and/or acceptors from two organisms are interchangeable depends upon not only the organisms in question but also the particular amino acid

Additional Information

© 1961 by the National Academy of Sciences Communicated June 26, 1961 We are particularly grateful to Paul Berg for making several manuscripts available to us before publication. The research was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health.

Attached Files

Published - BENpnas61c.pdf

Files

BENpnas61c.pdf
Files (687.6 kB)
Name Size Download all
md5:98df5037924e83262ddeaab3bafccc32
687.6 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 21, 2023
Modified:
October 23, 2023