Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published February 11, 2020 | Submitted + Published + Supplemental Material
Journal Article Open

Combinatorial protein–protein interactions on a polymerizing scaffold

Abstract

Scaffold proteins organize cellular processes by bringing signaling molecules into interaction, sometimes by forming large signalosomes. Several of these scaffolds are known to polymerize. Their assemblies should therefore not be understood as stoichiometric aggregates, but as combinatorial ensembles. We analyze the combinatorial interaction of ligands loaded on polymeric scaffolds, in both a continuum and discrete setting, and compare it with multivalent scaffolds with fixed number of binding sites. The quantity of interest is the abundance of ligand interaction possibilities—the catalytic potential Q—in a configurational mixture. Upon increasing scaffold abundance, scaffolding systems are known to first increase opportunities for ligand interaction and then to shut them down as ligands become isolated on distinct scaffolds. The polymerizing system stands out in that the dependency of Q on protomer concentration switches from being dominated by a first order to a second order term within a range determined by the polymerization affinity. This behavior boosts Q beyond that of any multivalent scaffold system. In addition, the subsequent drop-off is considerably mitigated in that Q decreases with half the power in protomer concentration than for any multivalent scaffold. We explain this behavior in terms of how the concentration profile of the polymer-length distribution adjusts to changes in protomer concentration and affinity. The discrete case turns out to be similar, but the behavior can be exaggerated at small protomer numbers because of a maximal polymer size, analogous to finite-size effects in bond percolation on a lattice.

Additional Information

© 2020 The Author(s). Published under the PNAS license. Edited by Peter Schuster, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, and approved December 24, 2019 (received for review July 24, 2019). Published January 24, 2020. We gratefully acknowledge discussions with Tom Kolokotrones, Eric Deeds, and Daniel Merkle. A.O.-M. and H.F.M.-A. contributed equally to this work. Author contributions: A.O.-M., H.F.M.-A., and W.F. designed research, performed research, contributed new reagents/analytic tools, and wrote the paper. The authors declare no competing interest. This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. This article contains supporting information online at https://www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1912745117/-/DCSupplemental.

Attached Files

Published - 2930.full.pdf

Submitted - 1907.11533.pdf

Supplemental Material - pnas.1912745117.sapp.pdf

Files

2930.full.pdf
Files (10.0 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:68d6e62be6d6d378c05c8b18b1fd6345
1.4 MB Preview Download
md5:3e21120cece6892579eb38d0de2b44c4
3.9 MB Preview Download
md5:6d31ecdc3db7e617fb8daa5b135f159e
4.8 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 19, 2023
Modified:
October 19, 2023